noemon wrote:Several million of people in the US are peacefully protesting against police brutality and your pathetic federal government is responding with extra & added police brutality.
The federal government responded only in DC. Federal troops have not been used in states, but are ready if needed. Several governors have used their national guards to assist in quelling riots. If they want to federalize them, they can.
noemon wrote:Your ridiculous president instead of calming people down, he is criticising those who are hesitating to be more violent against American citizens exercising their first amendment rights.
There is no first amendment right to riot. You aren't even allowed to block the street without a permit. That is also illegal.
noemon wrote:He is threatening to use the army against the American people.
So? @drlee mentions this everytime the right gets their dander up and wants a revolution. That never seemed to bother you.
noemon wrote: That is not the media lying about it, he is consciously making these statements on his own.
Donald Trump does not run any urban police force anywhere. He did not create or sustain the conditions that led to George Floyd's death. That type of police brutality happens in places controlled almost exclusively by Democrats. Once again, it is noted that you refuse to criticize America's Democrat party, even when they openly kill minorities.
Donald Trump also did not coordinate with rioters to loot and burn inner city businesses. Again, these are mostly people who vote Democrat who are engaged in this sort of behavior.
noemon wrote:He could have calmed everybody down even by doing nothing at all and by merely pretending that he would do something, but he is totally incapable of putting his ego on the side. You know it just as well as I know it.
He clearly ordered the DoJ to expedite a civil rights investigation into the Minneapolis Police Department. That's substantive. Trump didn't incite anyone to riot.
noemon wrote:Bring evidence that contradict my source, you own word is worthless.
There is no evidence that contradicts your source, because it doesn't exist. The burden is the other way around. If you want to assert law, it has to follow the law of notice. Show me a single instance of a published law against jaywalking that is punished as a misdemeanor in the United States. It doesn't exist.
In California, where I live, the jaywalking statute is
CVC 21955. See
the entire chapter.
Notice something? It only applies where there are stop lights. Police may cite you when there are stop signs. That's not proper. I never got a jaywalking ticket, but I would fight virtually every parking ticket when I lived in San Francisco. I know the vehicle code backwards and forwards.
Tainari88 wrote:Trump flies by the seat of his big boy pants. He rarely organizes his moves or thoughts. He just goes by his 'gut' and his gut is terrible at statesmanship or even solid political strategy like reviewing who he will put in to a position and what the expectations are for that position. He is a chaotic man BJ. You know this very well.
Statesmanship is basically precluded in a hyperpartisan environment. In the past, Democrats and Republicans would come together and condemn looting and rioting. Today, they don't. Democrats are calling for an end to police forces. The "promise" is that some day of peace will arrive. What will happen if such a ludicrous notion materialized is the return of safety committees and Ku Klax Klan style political gangs.
Tainari88 wrote:The majority of the complaints against him are about lack of predictable behavior that is safe and consistent to his Republican so called values.
Hardly. The majority of the complaints are that he's a racist. That's what @noemon is saying rather boldly in spite of the fact that most of these racist interaction with the police happen in places controlled exclusively by Democrats.
Do you see why I don't care about the lack of predictable behavior? Democrats kill black guy, Democrats blame Republicans, Republicans act all defensive. I'm frankly not interested in predictable. It's time to put some Democrats in jail for their chronic wrongdoing and corruption. It's time to vote out Republicans who play along with this game.
Tainari88 wrote:He doesn't have them because he is a narcissist and it is consistent lack of understanding of what is needed to play the role he assigned himself of the president of the US of A.
He did not assign himself the role. He ran for office and was elected. He was elected precisely to disrupt the system.
Tainari88 wrote:That is Candace's problem she is picking an anti-establishment nationalist stance like you are?
She is not beating the drums for war with Iran like Condoleeza Rice and the rest of the neoconservative establishment. The Bush family just put a black face on their foreign policy. Hell, if I was Trump I'd blast Colin Powell right back and say that Powell lied to the UN Security Council to help Bush start a war in Iraq. That's Powell's eternal shame. Trump should push that button.
Tainari88 wrote:And she is part of the cultural and ethnic group of African Americans that you say Murray deems as a group lower IQ.
Murray did not say all blacks have lower IQ than all whites. You keep asserting things that are not true. Read the book if you want to know what Murray said. If you read critiques of the book, you'll know a whole lot of things that Murray did not say--like that ridiculous critique you implored me to read from beginning to end that suggested that Murray was a racist, because of what he did not say.
Murray clearly noted that there was a higher standard deviation among the black population in IQ scores and that there was a lower standard deviation among the Asian population. It's not hard to figure out what Murray said if you actually read what he said instead of reading hyper-emotional reactions to what he said that assert he says things he did not say.
Tainari88 wrote:How is she going to get you guys on that team to make a lot of exceptions to the rule there and have her lead the Republicans to victory on a nationalist platform led by a Black woman who is an American nationalist? Tell me how that gets done? Because she wants to lead. She wants a power position in the Republican party. She wants congress seats and or senate seats.
Well, you seem to know more about her than I do. To me, she seems to be looking for a payday, not a power position. People in the media don't run for Congress, because they make more money. For example, if I ran for Congress and won for some unexpected reason, I would shit my pants, because it would be a big pay cut for me. Joe Scarborough makes more money pretending to be a highly emotional Democrat than he did when he was a Republican member of Congress--maybe he's some maudlin alcoholic or something now, but I'm more inclined to think it is an act.
Tainari88 wrote:Are there enough of you who want lots of conservative Black nationalist anti-establishment Right people on your political platform?
I've got no problem with her, but I'm sure the neoconservatives won't like her.
"We have put together the most extensive and inclusive voter fraud organization in the history of American politics."
-- Joe Biden