Repeat to Fade wrote:Your reluctance to give a simple answer will confirm everyones suspicions. I asked about immigration, immigrants and muslims too. You never came close to answering them. Your reply that I can find it on the website is pretty dumb. If I wanted to look at your website I wouldn't be on this forum, not looking at your website. You are here to promote your beliefs, not to advertise. You are not allowed to advertise here.
We are steadfast in preserving our ancestral and cultural heritage, traditions, customs and values as well as respecting those of other peoples within our country. We oppose mass immigration and support the maintenance of the indigenous British people as the demographic majority within Great Britain. The Workers People's Party is committed to maintaining and strengthening British social values as the foundation of our society and culture.
Are you concerned about the racial makeup of this country?
We are but only from an empirical approach, that is, we acknowledge the problems caused by racial tensions in society as a product of liberalism and reverse racism. That will end, but we have no particular fetish towards any specific group. So long as a group conforms to the reasonable tenants of our vision for society, there is no problem.
What about multiculturalism?
Multiculturalism, a fairly popular and modern notion from the school of postmodernism is the single greatest threat to the western world. It is in essence doctrine of intrinsic values that the free exchange equal values with no understanding of superior an inferior. This means that the core values of Britain is that we accept all values, which really means we have no core values no civilization, multiculturalism denies us the basic right of a national community. It should therefore be understood that this has little or nothing to do with race and ethnicity, that’s multi racialism, so we cannot be said to be racist. One of the problems with a large immigrant population is that it is harder for that group to feel part of our nation if their ancestors had no making in the nation itself, as opposed to the blood of the indigenous population whose blood has been spilt across the earth, the way to unify a nation in this way is therefore the willingness to fight and die for our nation and ideals, Britain has not been static and new legacies must be built for its continued survival.
What are your views on immigration and immigrants who already reside here?
All British immigrants we believe must be entirely loyal to Britain, and must be willing to endorse, at the very least the traditions, standards and values of our British, European way of life. We see great social problems bought by conflicting cultures and nationalities, and oppose all self serving multi nationals who wall themselves in ghettos . When we can all truly start to see each other as British, we can progress as a nation. With the exception of some few instances when Britain is indebted to the individual i.e. a Gurkha who has fought for Britain, we believe that before even being considered, all potential immigrants of all colours and creeds must want to conform to that ideal, we utterly deny the globalist ideal of moving large numbers of humans around the world like cattle for their own short term profit, whilst immigration itself is permanent.
We believe that our nation is entitled to secure its borders and would step up the campaign to deport illegal immigrants. We believe in securing the national borders by whatever means necessary. We would also reduce mass immigration and asylum into the United Kingdom. Authorised immigrants would need to have special skills that are needed in the U.K., they would also have to speak, read and write English and finally have enough money to support themselves for a year as no money or free medical or housing would be given unless special circumstances have been agreed by the state with the applicant. Mass immigration would be stopped for the next five years.
A visa would be needed for any non U.K. citizen who wished to enter the country, not including citizens of Canada, Australia, and New Zealand.
Though we believe the notion of free movement in Europe to be admirable, a Europe where the huddled masses scramble to where the pickings are thickest is hardly a vision of strong free European nations in mutual cooperation. We would therefore like to see some reasoned restriction on the level movement within Europe for those who lack necessary skills, qualifications and possess a criminal record.
The right to British citizenship should be automatically granted due to birth but not length of residency. We believe that citizenship by length of residency needs to be earned by dedication, loyalty and service to the nation.
What are you going to do with those immigrants who do not comply?
Those guests/foreigners/immigrants/asylum seekers/tourists which do make up a percentage of our present population that would insult our national hospitality for example by doing actions that are undesirable or counter productive to a better stronger society would be expected to depending on circumstances of course be asked to leave, be encouraged to leave or even forcibly deported in some cases. Our request is entirely reasonable and does not infringe on religious beliefs or human dignity, they up to this point have certainly been happy to embrace the socio economic benefits of a wealthy, hospitable and advanced country for which our ancestors worked hard for to build. So those long-term visitors who do disrespect our laws, ways and cultural traditions will be given a simple choice again, depending on circumstances to either be loyal to Britain and accept our way of life, or return to their origin homelands to which they feel more connected. Those who do wish to stay will be given all the help required to finally embrace the benefits of living and working in the UK in peace and harmony.
Can committed believers of any faith share a common political life in the context of a secular National Integralist state? Many British believers may want the policies of the state to reflect their deeply held religious convictions and values. National Integralism is secular and does not permit the state imposing religiously inspired values in the absence of any purely secular justification.
We believe Religion can have a place and coexist with the interests of the nation, so long as it does not go against the national interest. Though we do however acknowledge the historical context, continuity and identity, offered by our Pagan and Christian heritage, and whose retrospective achievements and aesthetics will be integral to our national rebirth. We are distrusting of any organisation that claims a higher authority and loyalty to that of ones country. When a religious organisation or sect, like the current strands of radical Islam, becomes a sectional group in its own right, it poses the same threat as any form of Marxism and operates in the same way, an international sectional interest that directly opposes the state and can physically attack it. We believe that to create a unified society, we must respect our peoples right to religious beliefs, however your allegiance to your country should not be compromised or should not put other at risk of compromising's theirs because of your personal religious beliefs.
Your place of worship or home is your sanctuary. At home prey all you wish of any faith if it is not disturbing others in your near vicinity. This is the general view held by most religious people and is how our secular nation has worked for hundreds of years we are simply re-affirming this. We are generally distrusting of any religious organisation that denies what is proven fact or seeks to impose its own moral code and truths over its followers.
We do have a few articles that pertain to this topic but it would be too much to address all here. But the party's official position on race and religion is this and I quote:
Races though unique are equal; Individuals however are not in the world we live in. Regardless of race ethnicity, colour, men are not created mentality, socially, morally the same, yet, each may use his or her unique talents for virtue.
Religion provides a personal comfort for some and should be allowed to continue to do so within our idea of a fully functioning state, so long as it does not actively work against the state, attempt to manipulate it followers into subversive actions, attempt to gain or hold political power or influence.
- By QatzelOk