Pants-of-dog wrote:You were asked to find where in that is the text that shows that all Canadians must die. Since you have not shown that, it can be assumed that it is a difficult interpretation to support.
Now, if I were to simply replace “Canadian” with Israeli (or Chilean or US), we would have the same criticism of settler colonialism and still no call for genocide.[
They're 2 different situations with different context. In this case, the Israelis are indigenous to Israel, which was afterwards renamed as "Palestine" after the Muslim Arab empire settler colonials invaded and conqured Israel. The Israelis did not sign most of their land away with legal treaties like the Canadian indigenous people did.
If indigenous people in Canada want all of their land back that they signed away, ok they have a right to protest for that. If the indigenous people of Canada elected a government that were known jihadist terrorists that target civilians to murder and in their Charter seek to "obliterate" Canada through jihad and kill non-indigenous Canadians, and committed genocide including rape and hostage-taking on Oct 7 and who chant "From ocean to ocean Turtle Island will be free", then other "peaceful" protestors who join those chants after a genocide has taken place may want to find a different slogan than the one the genocidal terrorists use.
We've seen a whole bunch of pro-Palestine protestors including students support Oct 7, and you yourself refuse to condemn Oct 7, so it's pretty hard to tell peaceful from genocidal protestors these days if they're saying similar things and seem to mostly all support each other and use anti-Zionist chants that Hamas uses. Of course we have York U student union groups supporting Oct 7 as a "strong act of resistance". I'd love to see some student protestors and more pro-Palestine supporters in general on video or in writing condemning Oct 7.
https://www.cp24.com/news/abhorrent-yor ... lay%3DtrueNo.
Police brutality as a reaction to a peaceful protest is illegal, an overreach of government power, and anti-democratic.
This is relevant.
What you're saying is legally incorrect. It was an illegal protest because they were served a trespass notice and refused to leave. Nobody has a Charter right to peaceful protest on private property that doesn't belong to them. Nobody has a right to go on private property and set up dozens of tents and pitching signs in the ground etc without the consent of the property owners/management.
The public is not allowed into a Walmart store at all hours of the night,
The public is allowed on university grounds at all hours of the night.
So being on university grounds is not trespassing.
You're right, and that's not why they were trespassed. Students aren't allowed inside their university at all hours of the night, but they can walk on outside grounds just like they can walk through the Walmart parking lot. The protestors are allowed to protest on university groups just like the university has said, they aren't allowed to set up dozens of tents on the quad. They were trespassed for setting up camps, that's exactly what the school and police said.
Feel free to bring dozens of your friends to a Walmart parking lot and set up dozens of tents and form an encampment and sleep overnight and see what happens. Bring some signs and protest whatever you don't like about Walmart too if you like, or any other cause. 100% guarantee you'll be trespassed and if you don't leave then the police will be called and force you to leave. When people don't comply with lawful orders police have every right to use the minimal amount of violence necessary to enforce the law, including tear gas, pepper spray, and forcing people into handcuffs for arrest.
If you wish to continue to not understand basic property law and Charter law feel free.