- 18 Feb 2011 07:06
#13632874
Your asking us to argue against arguments that you have stated the existence of, but you haven't told us what these arguments are.
Arguing effectively against supposed existing arguments is incredibly difficult. And it prevents the use of deconstructive matter.
What exactly are these arguments?
I can't just look them up because I might find a different set of arguments and out points will not clash. Lack of clash in an argument is silly.
Arguing effectively against supposed existing arguments is incredibly difficult. And it prevents the use of deconstructive matter.
What exactly are these arguments?
I can't just look them up because I might find a different set of arguments and out points will not clash. Lack of clash in an argument is silly.