Why would that be necessary? I'm not talking joint governments here, I'm talking about both parties submitting separate confidence motions simultaneously.
Of course if both motions pass that'd be a problem. Maybe we could flip a coin then.
Wandering the information superhighway, he came upon the last refuge of civilization, PoFo, the only forum on the internet ...
Dr House wrote:I'm talking about both parties submitting separate confidence motions simultaneously.
Of course if both motions pass that'd be a problem.
Maybe we could flip a coin then.
Demo wrote:In other words, if you can get a government MP to sponser your bill, there is no reason why it couldn't be formally proposed.
HoniSoit wrote:Essentially, it introduces much-needed dynamics to the game in that the non-ruling parties cannot afford to constantly block government-sponsored bills if they wish to introduce their own bills. Now non-ruling parties need to negotiate with the government and support some of its bills in exchange for government sponsorship for their own bills.
You didn't watch the video I posted earlier which[…]
“Whenever the government provides opportunities […]
The GOP is pretty much the anti-democracy party a[…]
I just read a few satires by Juvenal, and I still[…]