- 22 Jun 2024 23:40
#15319046
What do you think will happen if it goes to trial?
No, it's not.
Those justifying and indeed chanting for repeating October 7 are.
So are those who tell Jews to go back to Poland, Germany, Israel or anywhere else they don't want to go.
I provided several examples of that.
The denial is strong in this one.
Not allowing for normal lectures because of the noise, for starters.
It's not and also not all schools even allow them to be. As in, there are schools where encampments can't happen simply because there's nowhere to camp.
Not true either. The protests are not popular.
Clear example of students harassing someone (an university president) at his home. Or what, you think protesting in front of your house isn't unwelcome conduct i.e. harassment?
KurtFF8 wrote:So it appears they disagree with even these charges. Not sure how that strengthens your argument in any way.
What do you think will happen if it goes to trial?
KurtFF8 wrote:No, I'm saying that antisemitic rhetoric is not common at anti-genocide demonstrations. It would take a redefinition of the term to claim otherwise. For example some people have tried this by claiming that phrases like "from the river to the sea" are inherently antisemitic, but this claim has been long discredited.
No, it's not.
Those justifying and indeed chanting for repeating October 7 are.
So are those who tell Jews to go back to Poland, Germany, Israel or anywhere else they don't want to go.
KurtFF8 wrote:Not a common thing said at these demonstrations. According to your own criteria, it shouldn't be a reflection on the whole movement. (You consistently dismiss racist remarks by the pro-regime folks as not a reflection of the general pro-regime "movement" so you should stay consistent)
I provided several examples of that.
The denial is strong in this one.
KurtFF8 wrote:Disruptive according to who? Disruptive in what way?
Not allowing for normal lectures because of the noise, for starters.
KurtFF8 wrote:Schools are public spaces. The "property rights" question is out of place here.
It's not and also not all schools even allow them to be. As in, there are schools where encampments can't happen simply because there's nowhere to camp.
KurtFF8 wrote:Only to genocide supporters. But people who generally oppose things like genocide (the majority of people) agree with these peaceful protests.
Not true either. The protests are not popular.
KurtFF8 wrote:This is also not related to the first thing you posted.
Clear example of students harassing someone (an university president) at his home. Or what, you think protesting in front of your house isn't unwelcome conduct i.e. harassment?