wat0n wrote:More copouts, you are like that other weasel in this forum.
Just say you are a Holocaust denier and call it a day. It is just the next step in the process, isn't it?
I'm actually accusing you of
denial, genocide denial and therefore no better than a Holocaust denier.
wat0n wrote:Not really, and indeed it's why there's a trial in the first place.
See more
denial, even denying there's evidence for ongoing genocide.
wat0n wrote:Material evidence matters. The evidence of the Holocaust's industrial nature is overwhelming.
As is the evidence of Zionist racial supremacy, ethnic cleansing and genocide in Gaza overwhelming. I don't have a dog in the fight, I'm a neutral objective party. My argument with you is no different how it would be if I were arguing with a Nazi.
wat0n wrote:That is exactly how collateral damage works. When the Allies bombed German cities to destroy military and industrial infrastructure, they were aware German civilians would be killed too.
Yes I said as much if you reread what I wrote "Yes I agree the Axis power and the Allies killed innocent people and on that basis there was no difference".
wat0n wrote:Lost moral compass, as one can expect from leftists. And you conveniently forget about those killed by communist dictatorships.
What
exactly do you disagree with? Here, here's the paragraph again:
Yes I agree the Axis power and the Allies killed innocent people and on that basis there was no difference. It was a fight over ideology but to assume the Axis powers were "good" and the Nazis were "bad" is to sanitize reality. The colonial powers killed more victims as a result of their colonial escapades than the Nazis killed Jews, some estimates say that the British Empire resulted in some 100 million deaths.
What do you disagree with??
wat0n wrote:Not really, the Nazis at Nuremberg did not deny their actions and even their intent. Instead, they justified them.
Many did, they denied it was murder or immoral. They argued that Jews were animals and so killing animals is not murder, sound familair?
Here read it yourself, these are all actual remarks made by Zionists racists:
Do you agree with any of those remarks? do you admire these individuals? do you respect them? Look at the section "Rats" that is from 1938 before WW2 started, before the Holocaust, ten years before the founding of the state of Israel.
I'd only need to edit that text and change a few words and it would be exactly the same as if the Nazis had said those things - because they did. It is disgusting, horrifying and no decent human being can condone such language, it is the languages of the Third Reich, it must be stopped and the war criminals in Israel today must be held accountable, Jews, decent human beings must do this, the Jews must put Israel on trial and rid the land of these dangerous depraved monsters.
Source:
Animal stereotypes of Palestinians in Israeli discourse