- 14 Oct 2023 16:05
#15290929
Have we reached an era where the labor of the vast majority of the human genre is no longer sufficient to secure the security of our species?
Would it be wise to eliminate up to 99% of humanity in order to protect what remains of the natural environment?
Hasn't technology evolved to the point where most of the labor that the 1% require to live comfortable and hyper-consumption-anchored lives can be done by machines that require less resource consumption than the humans who once did those jobs?
Is humanity now in the same situation as the prehistoric animals who did the labor on the Flinstones?
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/The_Limits_to_Growth
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Automation
Would it be wise to eliminate up to 99% of humanity in order to protect what remains of the natural environment?
Hasn't technology evolved to the point where most of the labor that the 1% require to live comfortable and hyper-consumption-anchored lives can be done by machines that require less resource consumption than the humans who once did those jobs?
Is humanity now in the same situation as the prehistoric animals who did the labor on the Flinstones?
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/The_Limits_to_Growth
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Automation
***
The goal is to use Afghanistan to wash money out of the tax bases of the US and Europe through Afghanistan and back into the hands of a transnational security elite.
The goal is an endless war, not a successful war.
— Julian Assange
The goal is to use Afghanistan to wash money out of the tax bases of the US and Europe through Afghanistan and back into the hands of a transnational security elite.
The goal is an endless war, not a successful war.
— Julian Assange