Pants-of-dog wrote:I was right.
Wrong.
Pants-of-dog wrote:It is racist propaganda.
@Victoribus Spolia’s “article” comes from a neo-Nazi website.
Whoa there cowboy, I got it from this website;
http://conservative-headlines.com/2012/ ... engage-in/and had it saved in my email for years, you just happened to find the same article quoted on StormFront (pretty sloppy on your part actually).
Pants-of-dog wrote: Race/ethnicity of abusers and victims was not independently associated with intimate partner femicide risk after control for other demographic factors.
This does not contradict the claims actually, this only says that if all other factors were controlled for that race would not be a significant independent factor
BY ITSELF. No one claimed otherwise, but whats makes blacks 33% more likely to be violent against their female partners to the point of death are those "controlled-factors" namely unemployment, drug-abuse, alcoholism, lack-of-education, lack-of-employment, gang-involvement etc.
Hence, blacks are far more likely to kill their female partners, especially white partners (for some reason), because they are far more likely to be unemployed, uneducated,
et al. You really need to learn how statistics work.
FACT: If a white woman dates a black man, she is statistically more likely to be killed by her partner than in any other racial pairing. PERIOD.Facts aren't racists pants, this is just reality, you can interpret it any way you want, but my point stands.