- 15 Mar 2018 01:26
#14896536
Neither did Plato or Socrates, but that doesn't mean Hawking's unwarrented entries into metaphysical philosophy under the banner of "Science" are more "advanced" than theirs just because "Modernism Rulz". His Multiverse theory is mainly pure fiction.
Also "Rigour"= Passion for the job at hand....
So technically he did. Stupid to say "Newton didnt love science and didn't have passion for his profession" as that doesn't make much sense. I accept your arguement he lived in the 17th century, but I think you were looking for the word knowledge instead.
I know I'm being pedantic over that but it does technically mean "Passion for the work" and "loving the job and doing it well".
Location: Melbourne, Australia
Ideology: Australian Liberalism
Pants-of-dog wrote:Now Newton lived in the 17th century, so of course he did not have the same rigour when it comes to science as compared to Hawkins.
Neither did Plato or Socrates, but that doesn't mean Hawking's unwarrented entries into metaphysical philosophy under the banner of "Science" are more "advanced" than theirs just because "Modernism Rulz". His Multiverse theory is mainly pure fiction.
Also "Rigour"= Passion for the job at hand....
So technically he did. Stupid to say "Newton didnt love science and didn't have passion for his profession" as that doesn't make much sense. I accept your arguement he lived in the 17th century, but I think you were looking for the word knowledge instead.
I know I'm being pedantic over that but it does technically mean "Passion for the work" and "loving the job and doing it well".
Location: Melbourne, Australia
Ideology: Australian Liberalism