- 21 Nov 2017 16:56
#14864575
Doubling down on your errors is not an argument.
Also, refusing to read sources is also not an argument.
For the record, the phrase “toxic masculinity”is not supposed to be a description of all masculinity. It is used to separate those traditionally masculine traits that have negative impacts from those traditionally masculine traits that do not,
For example, building things with your own two hands is considered traditionally masculine, but is not toxic. Beating your wife is considered traditionally masculine and is toxic because it has a negative impact.
There is a crack in everything,
That's how the light gets in...
SolarCross wrote:That you call masculinity "toxic" and associate it with negative things like bullying is what makes you self-hating. It is like a jew who believes in negative stereotypes of jews being nefarious or greedy, is said to be a self-hating jew.
This kind of literature is produced by really toxic people, actually deranged people. It is worthless.
If you became a self-hating man from reading shit like that, then that is all the more reason to avoid it.
Doubling down on your errors is not an argument.
Also, refusing to read sources is also not an argument.
For the record, the phrase “toxic masculinity”is not supposed to be a description of all masculinity. It is used to separate those traditionally masculine traits that have negative impacts from those traditionally masculine traits that do not,
For example, building things with your own two hands is considered traditionally masculine, but is not toxic. Beating your wife is considered traditionally masculine and is toxic because it has a negative impact.
There is a crack in everything,
That's how the light gets in...