- 20 Aug 2017 02:44
#14835049
There is nothing really there about new carbon dating of the Shroud. That is just about the old dating that was shown to be dating a contaminated corner. There was never any question about the accuracy of the dating method, but only what they actually dated. They did not really date the shroud as the video proves. But there has been new dating of the Shroud by two or three new non-destructive methods that date the Shroud back to the time of Christ.
http://www.huffingtonpost.com/2013/03/2 ... 71850.html
HalleluYah
Praise the Lord
MB. wrote:The youtube video you posted was posted in 2010, the peer reviewed journal from nuclear physicists at Cambridge I posted was published in 2016.
If you were me, who would you believe in this situation?
There is nothing really there about new carbon dating of the Shroud. That is just about the old dating that was shown to be dating a contaminated corner. There was never any question about the accuracy of the dating method, but only what they actually dated. They did not really date the shroud as the video proves. But there has been new dating of the Shroud by two or three new non-destructive methods that date the Shroud back to the time of Christ.
http://www.huffingtonpost.com/2013/03/2 ... 71850.html
HalleluYah
Praise the Lord
The more I study science, the more I believe in God.
- Albert Einstein
- Albert Einstein