redcarpet wrote:Thx Wat0n, as usual Haretz proves it's #1 for Israeli journalism, etc. This stupid rhetorical game played by that....person....beggars belief....almost.
Ever since the paper was bought by a former Nazi German family, the paper is read in Israel as propagating the German interests and vision in the region. For this, many if its chief editors and writers refused the deal and left the paper. Yoav Karni, its former chief foreign correspondent called the paper treacherous.
Germany loves its holocaust *narrative*. For ages they say Germany has responsibility for the Palestinians because they are "the victims's victim", opening the way for delegitimization of Israel and joining Palestinian propaganda. BN recall their past cooperation disturbed their task to block guilt by portraying the Arabs as victims of the Jews, and not victims of their own savage deeds.
http://www.ynetnews.com/articles/0,7340 ... 89,00.htmlHaaretz's 'Nazi problem'
German publishing group that purchased 25 percent of Israeli daily cooperated with Nazis
Eldad Beck
COLOGNE – Controversial deal: The decision to sell 25 percent of Haaretz Group's shares to newspaper and book publisher DuMont Schauberg last week has come under scrutiny as a result of the German publisher's ties with the Nazi regime.
The publishing group's owner at the time, Kurt Neven DuMont – the current owner's father – was reportedly a member of the Nazi party, while his newspapers advanced Nazi ideology. As a result, the publishing house was among the only private ones in Germany whose operations were never outlawed by Hitler.
The publisher's official history makes no mention of historical facts that tie the family to the Nazi regime, even though Kurt Neven DuMont was a member of the Nazi party since 1937. In 1944, he received a prestigious decoration – the same kind also awarded to Gestapo Chief Heinrich Himmler – because he continued to publish newspapers despite heavy allied bombings.
Meanwhile, some historians and journalists claim that the publisher's management has made an effort to prevent various publications regarding the company's and owners' problematic past.
'No choice but to comply'
However, Israel's former Ambassador to Germany Avi Primor has come to current owner Alfred Neven DuMont's defense. In an article he wrote, Primor described the assistance he received from Neven DuMont in his dealings with Germany's business and political elites and said the publishing group's owner has supported various projects in Israel.
Haaretz publisher Amos Schocken responded to the reports, saying that he is aware that Kurt Neven DuMont was a member of the Nazi party. He noted that although the newspaper chain received orders from the Nazis, it had no choice but to comply with the dictates of a dictatorial regime.
"Alfred Neven DuMont (the current owner of the publishing house) has no Nazi past. He was 12 when the war broke out and almost 18 when it ended," Schocken said. "His actions since he has become an adult speak for themselves. There's no reason to impose on him, or the company he now leads, responsibility for a period before his time. This has nothing to do with finding out the historical truth, which is something that should always be done."
Netanyahu responds to critics: Absurd to ignore mufti's role in Holocaust:
http://www.haaretz.com/israel-news/.premium-1.681580
Netanyahu stressed that there are many testimonies of the mufti's involvement in the Final Solution. He quoted parts of the testimony given by Adolf Eichmann's deputy Dieter Wisliceny at the Nuremberg trials. Wisliceny said that "the mufti played an important role in the Final Solution and was one of the initiators of the systematic extermination of European Jews."
According to Netanyahu, there is an attempt by some academic researchers to provide apologetic explanations for the mufti's role during the Holocaust, but added there are other researchers who reference the testimonies against al-Husseini.
"I didn't mean to absolve Hitler from responsibility, but to show that the father of the Palestinian nation wanted to destroy the Jews even without territories, without occupation and without settlements," the prime minister said. "Unfortunately, [al-Husseini] is still a revered figure in Palestinian society and in their books which are filled with incitement." This incitement, Netanyahu said, "started with him and continues today – not in the same manner, but it's the root of the problem."
He added that Palestinian President Mahmoud Abbas aggrandizes the mufti's name."It's important to recognize historical facts and not to ignore them – not then and not now," he said. He emphasized that he plans to demand John Kerry pressure Abbas to stop the incitements when he meets the Secretary of State in Berlin on Thursday. That incitement, Netanyahu said, was the source of the violence.
SS-Hauptsturmführer Dieter Wisliceny testified (a variation of) the following at the Nuremberg Trials
In my opinion, the Grand Mufti, who has been in Berlin since 1941, played a role in the decision of the German government to exterminate the European Jews, the importance of which must not be disregarded. He has repeatedly suggested to the various authorities with whom he has been in contact, above all before Hitler, Ribbentrop and Himmler, the extermination of European Jewry. He considered this as a comfortable solution for the Palestine problem.
In his messages broadcast from Berlin, he surpassed us in anti-Jewish attacks. He was one of Eichmann's best friends and has constantly incited him to accelerate the extermination measures. I heard him say that, accompanied by Eichmann, he has visited incognito the gas chamber in Auschwitz."
What ThirdTerm post
It was Barry Rubin and Wolfgang Schwanitz who originally came up with the theory that Haj Amin al-Husseini was actually responsible for the Holocaust, by instigating Hitler to commit the mass murder of the Jews in Europe. "Nazis, Islamists, and the Making of the Modern Middle East" (2014) was published by Yale University Press, a university press associated with Yale University, and Barry Rubin was a notable historian as far as I know, which makes it difficult to debunk their theory. Rubin and Schwanitz came up with the thesis after some extraordinary research using a lot of new archive material, from which the Grand Mufti's incriminating quotes were sourced. Binyamin Netanyahu simply repeated what he read in his controversial speech.
During the 1930s and 1940s, a unique and lasting political alliance was forged among Third Reich leaders, Arab nationalists, and Muslim religious authorities. From this relationship sprang a series of dramatic events that, despite their profound impact on the course of World War II, remained secret until now. In this groundbreaking book, esteemed Middle East scholars Barry Rubin and Wolfgang G. Schwanitz uncover for the first time the complete story of this dangerous alliance and explore its continuing impact on Arab politics in the twenty-first century. Rubin and Schwanitz reveal, for example, the full scope of Palestinian leader Amin al-Husaini’s support of Hitler’s genocidal plans against European and Middle Eastern Jews. In addition, they expose the extent of Germany’s long-term promotion of Islamism and jihad. Drawing on unprecedented research in European, American, and Middle East archives, many recently opened and never before written about, the authors offer new insight on the intertwined development of Nazism and Islamism and its impact on the modern Middle East.
http://www.amazon.com/Nazis-Islamists-M ... 0300140908