- 04 Jan 2010 01:23
#13285875
We are talking about two separate things, I think. Yes, of course it requires wide-ranging and sweeping reforms to human culture, thought, and philosophy". This is not under contention and the reason why a technate has yet to be taken seriously. But I'm talking about outcomes and how a technocracy eliminates the need for government interventions on social issues, I'm not questioning the requirements of the populous to embrace the ideas. An example: Had technocracy been embraced during the Great Depression there would be no need for government laws, say, like the Civil Rights Act or Affirmative Action or Hate Crimes, etc. Elimination of the economic scarcity also eliminates class distinctions.
And what literature have your read on this, if you don't mind me asking?
Edited to add:
In short, I'm just saying what the brief in the technocracy website says:
And what literature have your read on this, if you don't mind me asking?
Edited to add:
In short, I'm just saying what the brief in the technocracy website says:
Technocracy, then concerns itself with the determination of the most probable in the field of social science - the determination of the most probable state of society. It has to do primarily with that part of the social mechanism relating to the production and distribution of goods and services, but it has many far-reaching social implications