- 16 Jul 2009 04:44
#13095630
Yet SN-RF could say the same thing MB..., about the rest of the parties.
I really think the biggest issue, as some did hint around at from to time, is that the over all premise is just a little flawed from the get-go.
It was a really fun idea, but without some concrete rules that can't be changed (I mean like in a video game) I just don't think anyone really trusts anyone else enough (for obvious reasons) to really make this work very well.
I could be wrong, we've got some sharp users...but still, there's blame all around for how it's turned out. I'm willing to accept mine, with the idea that I WAS trying.
But the idea that the communists ruined the game is non-sense. Had some other party won, the result would have been the same. They would have thrown out bills and nobody would have debated them. That's where the game breaks down, unfortunately.
Hell, the most fun was early on when we were all competing for votes and doing pm-backroom deals to try and make things work.
Ah well...
"When do you ask yourself,
'Maybe everyone else isn't wrong for using the definitions of words; maybe I'm wrong for making up new definitions of words and then using them as crude slurs' -TiG