- 03 Dec 2011 08:41
#13843974
So, while browsing some other forums I visit I randomly encountered Ted Kaczynski's "FC Manifesto" and the strange little ideology of anarcho-primitivism.
http://www.42inc.com/~estephen/manifesto/unabetoc.html
I find Kaczynski to be intriguing and definitely not insane, simply dedicated. I was relatively young when all the unabomber craziness was going on but I do recall it. I don't think Kaczynski himself was a leading theorist or developer of anarcho-primitivism but he seems to be very well acquainted with it. From what I can tell the ideology operates off of two principles: the power process and surrogate activities.
Essentially, he regards a human beings struggle for survival in a non mechanical natural world as our only true state and that any endeavors we undertake after that as simple surrogate activities which mimic the power process, something we pursue when simple survival becomes easily attainable. However, I find flaws with this logic. First, if this our true and desirable state, why did early humans invest so much time and energy into developing tools and techniques to make primitive survival easier? If we only pursue surrogate activities because we become bored with our power to survive then why were we ever so desperate to escape it?
Second, what about art and other forms of creative output? Cave drawings for instance definitely occurred while humans were still engaged in an everyday struggle for survival. To me, it just seems apparent that human beings are hard wired to pursue these so called surrogate activities rather than it being an artificial pursuit of the power process.
What does everyone think of this? Are there any resident primitivists (though I suppose if you own a computer and regularly use the internet you aren't a very good one)? Does anyone actually desire a world that this ideology aims to create?
For what it's worth I did really enjoy his critique of the left, I am a fascist though.
http://www.42inc.com/~estephen/manifesto/unabetoc.html
I find Kaczynski to be intriguing and definitely not insane, simply dedicated. I was relatively young when all the unabomber craziness was going on but I do recall it. I don't think Kaczynski himself was a leading theorist or developer of anarcho-primitivism but he seems to be very well acquainted with it. From what I can tell the ideology operates off of two principles: the power process and surrogate activities.
THE POWER PROCESS
33. Human beings have a need (probably based in biology) for something that we will call the "power process." This is closely related to the need for power (which is widely recognized) but is not quite the same thing. The power process has four elements. The three most clear-cut of these we call goal, effort and attainment of goal. (Everyone needs to have goals whose attainment requires effort, and needs to succeed in attaining at least some of his goals.) The fourth element is more difficult to define and may not be necessary for everyone. We call it autonomy and will discuss it later (paragraphs 42-44).
34. Consider the hypothetical case of a man who can have anything he wants just by wishing for it. Such a man has power, but he will develop serious psychological problems. At first he will have a lot of fun, but by and by he will become acutely bored and demoralized. Eventually he may become clinically depressed. History shows that leisured aristocracies tend to become decadent. This is not true of fighting aristocracies that have to struggle to maintain their power. But leisured, secure aristocracies that have no need to exert themselves usually become bored, hedonistic and demoralized, even though they have power. This shows that power is not enough. One must have goals toward which to exercise one's power.
35. Everyone has goals; if nothing else, to obtain the physical necessities of life: food, water and whatever clothing and shelter are made necessary by the climate. But the leisured aristocrat obtains these things without effort. Hence his boredom and demoralization.
36. Nonattainment of important goals results in death if the goals are physical necessities, and in frustration if nonattainment of the goals is compatible with survival. Consistent failure to attain goals throughout life results in defeatism, low self-esteem or depression.
37. Thus, in order to avoid serious psychological problems, a human being needs goals whose attainment requires effort, and he must have a reasonable rate of success in attaining his goals.
SURROGATE ACTIVITIES
38. But not every leisured aristocrat becomes bored and demoralized. For example, the emperor Hirohito, instead of sinking into decadent hedonism, devoted himself to marine biology, a field in which he became distinguished. When people do not have to exert themselves to satisfy their physical needs they often set up artificial goals for themselves. In many cases they then pursue these goals with the same energy and emotional involvement that they otherwise would have put into the search for physical necessities. Thus the aristocrats of the Roman Empire had their literary pretensions; many European aristocrats a few centuries ago invested tremendous time and energy in hunting, though they certainly didn't need the meat; other aristocracies have competed for status through elaborate displays of wealth; and a few aristocrats, like Hirohito, have turned to science.
39. We use the term "surrogate activity" to designate an activity that is directed toward an artificial goal that people set up for themselves merely in order to have some goal to work toward, or let us say, merely for the sake of the "fulfillment" that they get from pursuing the goal. Here is a rule of thumb for the identification of surrogate activities. Given a person who devotes much time and energy to the pursuit of goal X, ask yourself this: If he had to devote most of his time and energy to satisfying his biological needs, and if that effort required him to use his physical and mental facilities in a varied and interesting way, would he feel seriously deprived because he did not attain goal X? If the answer is no, then the person's pursuit of a goal X is a surrogate activity. Hirohito's studies in marine biology clearly constituted a surrogate activity, since it is pretty certain that if Hirohito had had to spend his time working at interesting non-scientific tasks in order to obtain the necessities of life, he would not have felt deprived because he didn't know all about the anatomy and life-cycles of marine animals. On the other hand the pursuit of sex and love (for example) is not a surrogate activity, because most people, even if their existence were otherwise satisfactory, would feel deprived if they passed their lives without ever having a relationship with a member of the opposite sex. (But pursuit of an excessive amount of sex, more than one really needs, can be a surrogate activity.)
40. In modern industrial society only minimal effort is necessary to satisfy one's physical needs. It is enough to go through a training program to acquire some petty technical skill, then come to work on time and exert very modest effort needed to hold a job. The only requirements are a moderate amount of intelligence, and most of all, simple OBEDIENCE. If one has those, society takes care of one from cradle to grave. (Yes, there is an underclass that cannot take physical necessities for granted, but we are speaking here of mainstream society.) Thus it is not surprising that modern society is full of surrogate activities. These include scientific work, athletic achievement, humanitarian work, artistic and literary creation, climbing the corporate ladder, acquisition of money and material goods far beyond the point at which they cease to give any additional physical satisfaction, and social activism when it addresses issues that are not important for the activist personally, as in the case of white activists who work for the rights of nonwhite minorities. These are not always pure surrogate activities, since for many people they may be motivated in part by needs other than the need to have some goal to pursue. Scientific work may be motivated in part by a drive for prestige, artistic creation by a need to express feelings, militant social activism by hostility. But for most people who pursue them, these activities are in large part surrogate activities. For example, the majority of scientists will probably agree that the "fulfillment" they get from their work is more important than the money and prestige they earn.
41. For many if not most people, surrogate activities are less satisfying than the pursuit of real goals (that is, goals that people would want to attain even if their need for the power process were already fulfilled). One indication of this is the fact that, in many or most cases, people who are deeply involved in surrogate activities are never satisfied, never at rest. Thus the money-maker constantly strives for more and more wealth. The scientist no sooner solves one problem than he moves on to the next. The long-distance runner drives himself to run always farther and faster. Many people who pursue surrogate activities will say that they get far more fulfillment from these activities than they do from the "mundane" business of satisfying their biological needs, but that it is because in our society the effort needed to satisfy the biological needs has been reduced to triviality. More importantly, in our society people do not satisfy their biological needs AUTONOMOUSLY but by functioning as parts of an immense social machine. In contrast, people generally have a great deal of autonomy in pursuing their surrogate activities.
Essentially, he regards a human beings struggle for survival in a non mechanical natural world as our only true state and that any endeavors we undertake after that as simple surrogate activities which mimic the power process, something we pursue when simple survival becomes easily attainable. However, I find flaws with this logic. First, if this our true and desirable state, why did early humans invest so much time and energy into developing tools and techniques to make primitive survival easier? If we only pursue surrogate activities because we become bored with our power to survive then why were we ever so desperate to escape it?
Second, what about art and other forms of creative output? Cave drawings for instance definitely occurred while humans were still engaged in an everyday struggle for survival. To me, it just seems apparent that human beings are hard wired to pursue these so called surrogate activities rather than it being an artificial pursuit of the power process.
What does everyone think of this? Are there any resident primitivists (though I suppose if you own a computer and regularly use the internet you aren't a very good one)? Does anyone actually desire a world that this ideology aims to create?
For what it's worth I did really enjoy his critique of the left, I am a fascist though.
- By ingliz
- By wat0n
- By Tainari88
- By QatzelOk