Rich wrote:They were high water marks of Islamic advance after which Islamic rule was pushed back. 732 in Spain and Southern France. 1683 at Vienna. But it all depends on which way you cut it. I expect for example that for Saudi citizens life is considerably better by many measures than it was a hundred years ago. People of all cultures are prone to mourn the catastrophic loss of some mythical golden age.
I don't see how it is a "crisis" that Muslim's advance stopped during those years. Because honestly, who cares.
The golden age of Islam- around 1000 AD- is called Golden Age not because of the size of the Islamic world, but rather because of quality of life and civilization in that era. Muslims were having a good life back then. And I doubt that their "beliefs" back then were like Muslim people's believes nowadays.
They had economic prosperity, advances in science and technology.. none of this could have happened without respect for "human rights" and human "liberties and freedoms".
We call people of that era "Muslims" because that is where Muslims of today are located geographically. But I doubt there is any similarity between Muslims of today and Muslims of 1000 years ago.
The "Islam" we have today CANNOT bread civilization and freedom. As a "belief system", it is corrupt and discriminatory in nature. This Islam we have today could not have bread the civilization of the Middle East a thousand years ago. That is just not possible.
If I were a scholar, or had a team of scholars and historians up my arsenal, I would have dedicated a lot of effort into uprooting the mysteries of "Islam" of a thousand years ago and would have probably been able to demonstrate "objectively" that Islam today in the 21 century does not have any similarities to the Islam of 1000AD.
If you want to understand what I am talking about, contemplate the following analogy.
Today in America people love to chant concepts such as "democracy", "free market capitalism", ... etc. These are all words/labels that politicians use to advance their message and to make themselves popular. What how do those terms/words translate into reality and real policy is the real question.
I have seen numerous times when those same terms (democracy, free market) are used deviously to promote bad causes. Because let us be honest, whether you are a capitalist or a communist, it doesn't matter. What matters is what you do in the real world and the decisions that you make as a policy maker.
You can be inspired by "capitalism" and the idea of "free market" (as I am for example), you can be inspired by "communism" or "socialism" as concepts (as some of you might be- I don't know enough about communism or socialism to be inspired by them, but I am sure there is something to learn from either of those concepts) but at the end of the day, it is the decisions that you make as a policy maker that matter and affect our lives, not what it is called in the real of "political science".
So to get back to Islam,
I can certainly imagine that terms such as "capitalism" or "communism" can be worshiped some day and become religion some day in the future, where people claim that capitalism was what gave them their civilization in the past.
Islam today is just a bunch of terms and concepts. These very concepts and terms might have spurred some civilization a thousand years ago but now, they are devoid of meaning. They meanings and concepts that Islam promotes today cannot be what the same terms concepts promoted/applied in real life- a thousand years ago. Otherwise, there would not have been an Islamic civilization a 1000 years ago. There would be people killing each other and subjugating each other into repeating a stupid meaningless ritual 5 times a day.