MB. wrote:Can you explore more thoroughly the relationship between life and the planet? Specifically focusing on the parts which state that life 'owns' the planet?d
Life is to be preferred over non-life. If you reject this principle, than any and all moral systems go out of the window. From this, the propagation of life must be promoted. The "rock" is not going to do anything about it - it's a rock. Life must use the rock to spread throughout the universe. What's the point of a universe devoid of life? Nada.
Furthermore, I'd argue that space colonization is the most effective way to preserve life (avoids problems like deadly virus, supervolcanos and space impacts, etc. etc.). While you may argue that Life originated on the rock, that doesn't mean the rock dictates what happens to Life - since the rock won't be dictating anything anyway. You use "own" like it's a pejorative, but honestly, there's no alternative.