- 12 May 2004 14:10
#167189
Time for a tread on the hoax of all hoaxes.
A friend of mine is a bit of a nut ... and that's just how I've always looked at them nuts claiming the Apollo Missions were a hoax. I have no idea how we ended up talking about moon landings yesterday but as we got on with it he once again proved himself a nut.
He did, however, show me a photograph (supposedly taken on the surface of the moon) that is optically impossible. I searched the net this morning and found the picture spread all of the net - all bear the same imperfection.
A most interesting portion of the first picture is blown up here.
Take a look at the cross hairs that appear on the picture. These hairs should appear on every lunar picture. If you take a look at the cross hair on the left, this cross hair was placed behind the lunar rover (you can see the lunar rover is in front of the cross hairs). That's simply not possible because the cross hairs are placed between the shutter of the camera and the film which leaves absolutely no room for a lunar rover. How the rover got between the shutter and the film must puzzle most people (meself included) but of course there is a simple explanation: The lunar pictures were edited or faked.
Now if you ask me if the moon landings were a hoax I don’t know what to tell you … but I do know the pictures of it were edited and only modest imagination is necessary to conclude they are fake.
Of course my friend continued with loads of info but most left me lost in translation.
A friend of mine is a bit of a nut ... and that's just how I've always looked at them nuts claiming the Apollo Missions were a hoax. I have no idea how we ended up talking about moon landings yesterday but as we got on with it he once again proved himself a nut.
He did, however, show me a photograph (supposedly taken on the surface of the moon) that is optically impossible. I searched the net this morning and found the picture spread all of the net - all bear the same imperfection.
A most interesting portion of the first picture is blown up here.
Take a look at the cross hairs that appear on the picture. These hairs should appear on every lunar picture. If you take a look at the cross hair on the left, this cross hair was placed behind the lunar rover (you can see the lunar rover is in front of the cross hairs). That's simply not possible because the cross hairs are placed between the shutter of the camera and the film which leaves absolutely no room for a lunar rover. How the rover got between the shutter and the film must puzzle most people (meself included) but of course there is a simple explanation: The lunar pictures were edited or faked.
Now if you ask me if the moon landings were a hoax I don’t know what to tell you … but I do know the pictures of it were edited and only modest imagination is necessary to conclude they are fake.
Of course my friend continued with loads of info but most left me lost in translation.
Political forum vanguard.
. Who cares it still destroyed morale in Vietnam. There was a soldier who was listening to the Presiden's' speech: 'One small step in the moon and a huge step for mankind' or something like that and the soldier said ' yeah why don't you make a step out here with me you damn son of a bitch'. So if the Americans wanted to make a good impression of them the thing went back against them.
- By Doug64
- By JohnRawls
- By litwin