- 12 Feb 2020 20:21
#15066694
That only speaks to climate science, not all science. Further, even this problem (assume it's real), can be changed through the natural course of science eventually.
The thing about science is, when it's wrong, EVENTUALLY, EVENTUALLY it will get rectified.
Sivad wrote:
let's ask Mike Hulme, Professor of Climate Change at the University of East Anglia, how rational and dispassionate of an enlightened discourse Science! really is:
Mike Hulme, Professor of Climate Change at the University of East Anglia, which was ground zero of the Climategate scandal, suggested that the UN IPCC had “run its course.” He complained about its “tendency to politicize climate science” and suggested that it had “perhaps helped to foster a more authoritarian, exclusive form of knowledge production.”
Hulme warned, “It is possible that climate science has become too partisan, too centralized. The tribalism that some of the leaked emails display is something more usually associated with social organization within primitive cultures; it is not attractive when we find it at work inside science.”
That only speaks to climate science, not all science. Further, even this problem (assume it's real), can be changed through the natural course of science eventually.
The thing about science is, when it's wrong, EVENTUALLY, EVENTUALLY it will get rectified.
I can think of 11780 reasons Trump shouldn't be president ever again.