MememyselfandIJK wrote:I guess that[list=a]
[*]I must be an anti-Semite because I, a Jew, prefer non-jews
You will be called an "anti-Semite", if you promoted the marriage of Jews and non-Jews in Israel. They do not have an institution of civil marriage there, so they can assure that the marriages of Jews and non-Jews are not registered in Israel. And Jews never promote miscegenation and multiculturalism in Israel, they are supporting this only outside of Israel.
And if somebody tried to say that Hitler was not the Devil Incarnate, and did not kill as many people, as main stream historians believe, he would be imprisoned for it. But you, as a Jew, can whitewash the crimes of Bolsheviks/Commies, and even proudly display in your profile picture the most murderers leaders of Bolsheviks, that killed more civilians than any other totalitarian regime. like Lenin. No problems with that.
We see an obvious double standard.
MememyselfandIJK wrote:@ArtAllm, if you were well versed in evolutionary biology, you would know that humans have far less variation than most animal species (especially given our span). This effect would be all but nonexistent in humans -- we simply haven't have time to evolve apart yet.
A dog and a wolf separated later, than different varieties of Hominids, and they are genetically at least as close to each other, as different extant varieties of modern humans.
The "out of Africa" theory is virtually dead. The remnants of oldest first modern Humans were found ins South Europe, in Bulgaria. These modern Humans then intermixed with Neanderthals. In China they mixed wit the old varieties of Homo that originated there.
In Afrika these modern humans mixed with an ancient subspecies of Hominids that separated from modern Humans maybe millions of years ago.
So due to the continuity of local varieties of Homo, despite the interbreeding with later versions of Homo, we have distinct races of Humans.
And these theory is supported by Chinese scientists!
In 1998, Wu founded a China-specific Multiregional model called "Continuity with [Incidental] Hybridization".[11][12] Wu's variant only applies the Multiregional hypothesis to the East Asian fossil record which is popular among Chinese scientists.[13]
...
Xinzhi Wu has argued for a morphological clade in China spanning the Pleistocene, characterized by a combination of 10 features.[38][39] The sequence is said to start with Lantian and Peking Man, traced to Dali, to Late Pleistocene specimens (e.g. Liujiang) and recent Chinese.
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Multiregi ... ern_humans
MememyselfandIJK wrote: Humans are a single species and the concept that you have brought up would be more relevant in the humanzees (or liger or any other interspecies cross) that I discussed earlier.
Subspecies of the same species can easily mix and create viable offspring.
For example, modern humans could mix with this guy:
And they did, in Africa.
They could also mix with these Neanderthals:
And they did, in Europe.
In China, modern humans could mix with this Hominid:
And they did!
Anybody with half a brain can see the continuity of the racial/facial traits of Europeans, Sub Saharan Africans and East Asians, that can be found in extinct species of Hominids.
There are a lot of extinct subspecies of Homo, and there is a local continuity in different regions. In China, the skeletons of ancient Chinese Hominids are more similar to modern Chinese, than to Europeans. So very different subspecies of Homo evolved separately.
Is it not obvious that if the leftist agenda of creating a Mono-Homo-Mongrel, destroying all local varieties of Homo, that have a continuity going back millions of years, will reduce the diversity of the Species Homo?
Of course it is obvious!
If somebody tried to do this with the different breeds of dogs, cats, horses, and say that this will not reduce the biodiversity, and that the mixture of an Arab Horse with an Icelandic horse will not reduce the biodiversity, and that the offspring will not lose the special traits, then he will be put in a loony bin.
But if you do the same with the different breeds of Homo Sapiences, you are "politically correct".
How bizarre!
But this project, of creating a monolithic mongrel "Homo Globlaisticus", which is just a remake of the old Commie plan in creating a Homo Sovieticus, will not work out.
There will be a reaction to this misanthropic project, and the architects will this time have big difficulties to find a place on earth to hide...
_________________________________________________________________________________
"I don't care if Americans think we're running the news media, Hollywood, Wall Street or the government. I just care that we get to keep running them".
J. Stein