- 12 Dec 2012 14:41
#14128075
You are "stressing" the NAP under a set of circumstances that would challenge any legal framework.
Clearly, liberal government-imposed legal framework hasn't benefited NA to the extent you seem to advocate.
As I pointed above, historic injustices are inherently difficult to resolve. The difficulty of resolving them grows with time. This is a fact that applies to all legal/justice systems.
Beyond a certain point, even a theoretical restoration of rights (or restitution of past wrong-doing) becomes impossible, as the examples of the Bantu Expansion and the Anglo-Saxon occupation of Britain clearly illustrate.
To view the difficulty of an NAP-based justice system to deal with historic injustices as in any way peculiar or indicative of dishonesty by its adherents is disingenuous.
Clearly, liberal government-imposed legal framework hasn't benefited NA to the extent you seem to advocate.
As I pointed above, historic injustices are inherently difficult to resolve. The difficulty of resolving them grows with time. This is a fact that applies to all legal/justice systems.
Beyond a certain point, even a theoretical restoration of rights (or restitution of past wrong-doing) becomes impossible, as the examples of the Bantu Expansion and the Anglo-Saxon occupation of Britain clearly illustrate.
To view the difficulty of an NAP-based justice system to deal with historic injustices as in any way peculiar or indicative of dishonesty by its adherents is disingenuous.
Free men are not equal and equal men are not free.
Government is not the solution. Government is the problem.
Government is not the solution. Government is the problem.