- 30 Jun 2023 19:44
#15278676
What should've happen if the UK government introduces the new bill that allows the ban of short words to be in force across Southern England, followed by the UK in order to crackdown on it, because i have to explain (not trolling) to all of you that the use of short words in this country should've been wrong in the past and may have been wrong now. The people of this country must use the common wording instead, such as (as of the following, for example):
“gentleman” (“gentlemen”), “university” (“universities”), “congratulate” (“congratulations”), “problem” ("problems"), “favour”, (“favourite)”, “family (families)”, “preparation”, “prepare[d]”, “development (develop)”, “January”, “February”, “collaborate” (“collaboration”/“collaborator”), pre-visual (“pre visualisation”), “pre-production”, “people”, “second” ("seconds"), “Liberal Democrat” ("Liberal Democrats"), "holiday" ("holidays"), "executive" ("executive"). "generation". "Glastonbury". "obvious" ("obviously").
This should be a game changer but, before we can alter the past, we must learn lessons over the offensive and discriminatory use of short words (which is different to racism and harmful stereotypes as in today) before any investigation taken place and possible criminal charges with careful consideration (and also convictions) against people who discriminatory using short words may alter the course of human language history before the new law coming into force this year where possible because it is not acceptable to use every short word in a world we live because it make me feel so angry but also very upsetting (but also ending up hitting myself on a head due to my autism and nothing to do with mental health problems) and therefore all of you in this country (including everyday life and media) should discontinue use short words because it's also irritating me too. The use of short words may become likely to be harmful or wrong in the world we're living and it is unlikely to affect civil rights nor communication nor language but it is my right for ask the government to introduce the new law to honour myself in attempt to remove all of the short words in everyday life and in the world of media (including TV, radio, film, books, music, streaming, social media, podcasts, video gaming, articles, and newspapers) if by law and it is possible that archive material - including the 1977 Christmas special of Some Mothers Do Have Them - and modern projects (including the Simon Pegg's sci-fi movie The World's End and a 2018 BBC Music documentary, Bros: After the Screaming Stops, about the 80s band's reunion preparations in 2017) needs to be withdrawn from distribution over short words that used in the past. It also includes the possible removal of two Doctor Who episodes, due to the discriminatory short form language, that were part of Series 11 in 2018. The removal of short words must also happen in advertising, businesses, public houses, restaurants, and other premises in Southern England (making it the first country in the world to do so). However, i would say that it's likely for the investigation watchdog to look into it in building and telling the people some questions about the use of short words which may be likely to become harmful to myself (as I got very angry and upset by hitting myself in a head over discriminatory short words due to my autism but not mental health) for the past five years and therefore it is not acceptable for people to use the short form language in modern human history but i will continue to impose sanctions over short words until the governmental investigation and a new bill must come immediately. Although it should be a good idea, further precautions and care considerations may likely be taken first to ensure that it doesn't cause implications on human language and society beforehand. I believe that the government must be taken to account and to ask humanity to be held accountable over short words. That should be made possible, but if the short form of language are banned in Southern England and around the world, it could alter the course of human history and language for the generations both old & new - whenever you're a college/academic student or work people - but also society and freedom of speech forever!!!
By the way, i contacted Channel 4 two weeks ago about my issues with short words everywhere but (on 17th June) Channel 4 became the first broadcaster to have my voice heard and to understand my distress due to this. In a statement, Peter Lynas; who works with the broadcaster via its Viewers Enquiries; have said to me: We're sorry to read of any distress caused by the use of short form language on our programming. Please be assured, your concerns have been noted. That's the whole point.
“gentleman” (“gentlemen”), “university” (“universities”), “congratulate” (“congratulations”), “problem” ("problems"), “favour”, (“favourite)”, “family (families)”, “preparation”, “prepare[d]”, “development (develop)”, “January”, “February”, “collaborate” (“collaboration”/“collaborator”), pre-visual (“pre visualisation”), “pre-production”, “people”, “second” ("seconds"), “Liberal Democrat” ("Liberal Democrats"), "holiday" ("holidays"), "executive" ("executive"). "generation". "Glastonbury". "obvious" ("obviously").
This should be a game changer but, before we can alter the past, we must learn lessons over the offensive and discriminatory use of short words (which is different to racism and harmful stereotypes as in today) before any investigation taken place and possible criminal charges with careful consideration (and also convictions) against people who discriminatory using short words may alter the course of human language history before the new law coming into force this year where possible because it is not acceptable to use every short word in a world we live because it make me feel so angry but also very upsetting (but also ending up hitting myself on a head due to my autism and nothing to do with mental health problems) and therefore all of you in this country (including everyday life and media) should discontinue use short words because it's also irritating me too. The use of short words may become likely to be harmful or wrong in the world we're living and it is unlikely to affect civil rights nor communication nor language but it is my right for ask the government to introduce the new law to honour myself in attempt to remove all of the short words in everyday life and in the world of media (including TV, radio, film, books, music, streaming, social media, podcasts, video gaming, articles, and newspapers) if by law and it is possible that archive material - including the 1977 Christmas special of Some Mothers Do Have Them - and modern projects (including the Simon Pegg's sci-fi movie The World's End and a 2018 BBC Music documentary, Bros: After the Screaming Stops, about the 80s band's reunion preparations in 2017) needs to be withdrawn from distribution over short words that used in the past. It also includes the possible removal of two Doctor Who episodes, due to the discriminatory short form language, that were part of Series 11 in 2018. The removal of short words must also happen in advertising, businesses, public houses, restaurants, and other premises in Southern England (making it the first country in the world to do so). However, i would say that it's likely for the investigation watchdog to look into it in building and telling the people some questions about the use of short words which may be likely to become harmful to myself (as I got very angry and upset by hitting myself in a head over discriminatory short words due to my autism but not mental health) for the past five years and therefore it is not acceptable for people to use the short form language in modern human history but i will continue to impose sanctions over short words until the governmental investigation and a new bill must come immediately. Although it should be a good idea, further precautions and care considerations may likely be taken first to ensure that it doesn't cause implications on human language and society beforehand. I believe that the government must be taken to account and to ask humanity to be held accountable over short words. That should be made possible, but if the short form of language are banned in Southern England and around the world, it could alter the course of human history and language for the generations both old & new - whenever you're a college/academic student or work people - but also society and freedom of speech forever!!!
By the way, i contacted Channel 4 two weeks ago about my issues with short words everywhere but (on 17th June) Channel 4 became the first broadcaster to have my voice heard and to understand my distress due to this. In a statement, Peter Lynas; who works with the broadcaster via its Viewers Enquiries; have said to me: We're sorry to read of any distress caused by the use of short form language on our programming. Please be assured, your concerns have been noted. That's the whole point.
- By Rich
- By Skynet