Who is going to win democrat nominee 2020? - Page 16 - Politics Forum.org | PoFo

Wandering the information superhighway, he came upon the last refuge of civilization, PoFo, the only forum on the internet ...

Polls on politics, news, current affairs and history.

Who is going to win democrat nominee?

Bernie Sanders
23
47%
Joe Biden
19
39%
Elizabeth Warren
4
8%
Other
3
6%
#15072146
Finfinder wrote:This is setting up nicely for Hillary Clinton she must be itching to jump in this thing. . Can Joe even make it to the end, the guy doesn't even know what day of the week it is.


For sure any Democrat would raise taxes on every American and stall the economy and jobs. Democrats are job killers and tax and spenders. Good luck with that.


Biden is the Clinton machine and Obama's pick. For sure.

They don't understand that the more they want to control what the people want with going against the popular will? The less they have a chance at being in power.

They have to accept they are sellout people who don't deal with the working people well and have not for a very long time.

People become their habits Fin. And the Democrats whom are ignoring the enthusiasm Sanders has? Are the ones who are more attached to their habits than in the role of dealing with voters as the ones deciding.

They are not really into democracy the same as the Republicans ignoring popular votes to keep power....they are both doing things about habits. Bad habits.

It is going to cost them a lot.

But I think it is good that people see all the defective workings of the USA gov't. I knew about it for years....but Americans had been snowed by the corporate media and by very shrewd propaganda campaigns all this time.

We are going to see a new era of people who don't listen to media and start dealing with direct action and chaos and upheavals. The 60 percent making less than 40k on Trump policies are not going to see improvement Fin.

Those are the ones who either die of indifference and let it all go to pot...a possibility. Or they rise up and create issues and pick up on either a true nationalist candidate like BJ would like....or a hardcore left person willing to get the globalists in line.

It will happen eventually. But I don't know when it might? Your guess is as good as mine Fin.

This is for @blackjack21 :



Hmmm. They don't like thieves. Lol. So, the Bolivians deal with it. See what the Russian dude did? He is foreign, but he brought a Bolivian who is well known named Ramiro Rivera with him.

A smart move. You don't run around jumping in homes with nothing of interest to recommend you but a tweed jacket and bad and outright lying translations and nothing to help you along.

Think about it. Lol.

BJ, no seas malo....
#15072167
Tainari88 wrote:Biden is the Clinton machine and Obama's pick. For sure.

They don't understand that the more they want to control what the people want with going against the popular will? The less they have a chance at being in power.

They have to accept they are sellout people who don't deal with the working people well and have not for a very long time.


I don't think Biden can't mentally make it to the end. I have often said Democrats cannot win unless they cheat lie and rig the system. Seriously what have the Democrats accomplished in the last 10 years? I agree people are tired of it. Like Trump Sanders is a place disgruntled Democrats can land.

Tainari88 wrote:People become their habits Fin. And the Democrats whom are ignoring the enthusiasm Sanders has? Are the ones who are more attached to their habits than in the role of dealing with voters as the ones deciding.


I don't think they are ignoring it I think they are validating it. They are sacred shitless of losing power. The the problem is the Democrats have been failures for the last 10 years, they haven't governed and haven't accomplished anything, so the only way they can win is to lie cheat and rig the system.

Becareful though the enthusiasim is skewed by the actual number of people turning out to vote. That should be a concern.

Tainari88 wrote:They are not really into democracy the same as the Republicans ignoring popular votes to keep power....they are both doing things about habits. Bad habits.


Exactly they have failed to govern and instead focused on identity politics which has failed miserably.

Tainari88 wrote:It is going to cost them a lot.


Maybe the entire party and a lost generation of power. You just can't be this corrupt and accomplish nothing for a decades and be viable.

Tainari88 wrote:But I think it is good that people see all the defective workings of the USA gov't. I knew about it for years....but Americans had been snowed by the corporate media and by very shrewd propaganda campaigns all this time.


That is what happens when you go all in on fake hoaxes and lie to people for years. The liberal media has lost all its credibility. Interesting that they are choosing to make enemies with the Sanders supporters as well.

Tainari88 wrote:We are going to see a new era of people who don't listen to media and start dealing with direct action and chaos and upheavals. The 60 percent making less than 40k on Trump policies are not going to see improvement Fin.


You are smart do you really think Bernie's plan of taxing and spending 100 trillion is really supportive of a robust economy and more money in people pockets. All Bernie is supporting is a ruling class.

Tainari88 wrote:It will happen eventually. But I don't know when it might? Your guess is as good as mine Fin.


Who knows like Trump Bernie has a ton of political courage and I think that is so rare and generational that it may be a long time before we get there.
#15072169
Joe Biden is just like Hillary Clinton. He is running for president but he doesn't know why he is running. He has no ambitions. It wouldn't be wrong to call him as another useless career politician. I am sure that socialist wing of the party think exactly this. This will significantly reduce Joe Biden's chances of winning a general election.

"Trump versus Sanders" or "billionaire Trump versus billionaire Bloomberg" would be much more interesting.
#15072176
Istanbuller wrote:Joe Biden is just like Hillary Clinton. He is running for president but he doesn't know why he is running. He has no ambitions. It wouldn't be wrong to call him as another useless career politician. I am sure that socialist wing of the party think exactly this. This will significantly reduce Joe Biden's chances of winning a general election.

"Trump versus Sanders" or "billionaire Trump versus billionaire Bloomberg" would be much more interesting.


It's like not running for president but running for the next lead in a Weekend at Bernies sequel.
#15072180
Finfinder wrote:This is setting up nicely for Hillary Clinton she must be itching to jump in this thing. . Can Joe even make it to the end, the guy doesn't even know what day of the week it is.


For sure any Democrat would raise taxes on every American and stall the economy and jobs. Democrats are job killers and tax and spenders. Good luck with that.


Blatant lie btw. Republicans spend a lot more compared to the democrats. Also Democrats have this tendency of shrinking the deficit and decreasing the debt to gdp ratio a lot. Obama might be an exeption to this but he inherited the great recession so... He at least fixed the economy which Trump is living of right now. ( Plus Trump did a bit of tax cutting but the effects of those tax cuts have mostly disappeared now)
#15072184
JohnRawls wrote:Blatant lie btw. Republicans spend a lot more compared to the democrats. Also Democrats have this tendency of shrinking the deficit and decreasing the debt to gdp ratio a lot. Obama might be an exeption to this but he inherited the great recession so... He at least fixed the economy which Trump is living of right now. ( Plus Trump did a bit of tax cutting but the effects of those tax cuts have mostly disappeared now)


Blatant lie by you more so. Please get specific other than what Clinton somewhat did 30 years ago as it pertains to this election? You know what is a blatant lie supporting any of these Democrat spending programs with not one clue how they are going to be paid for.

I would like to see a balanced budget amendment but if we voted on that today who do think would be the loudest against it?
#15072186
@Finfinder :

You are smart do you really think Bernie's plan of taxing and spending 100 trillion is really supportive of a robust economy and more money in people pockets. All Bernie is supporting is a ruling class.


Fin, the new wealth has not trickled down to the vast majority of the 60% of workers who are making $40,000 a year or less. The new wealth is being siphoned off to the top tiny percentage. Why continue to work harder and harder, and with longer and longer hours and never see improvement because the money is going to the tiny group. Did you see the video I have posted before:




The Wall street crowd is hysterical with the idea of a tax on trade. It is going to cost the rich in general a good chunk of change.

I am of the opinion, that the way you stop the top sucking up all the productivity that is being freed up by automation and firing people for not being able to fit into a capitalist system that has no use for workers who have ordinary jobs is not ignoring the issue and letting people fester?....Trump wants the working class to work two jobs to pay for things....you don't see your kids, you don't have time to rest, you think about bills all day. What kind of a life is that. In the past people would work one job and the wife would stay home and raise the kids. The husband's salary was enough to sustain entire families. Why is it that two adults working full time which is the norm nowadays can't sustain a family if you are earning low wages?

Robert Reich explains it.

He discusses how that works.

How to cope?

Got to retake the wealth. What have the poor and the ones struggling got to lose Fin?

That stuff has got to stop. Eventually the medical bankruptcy issues has got to stop Fin.

The stuff is that the socialism is going to run into resistance...like in the video. But the fear of it? Will keep the capitalist hogs conceding rights...conceding....conceding.....

You get balance. The opposites who hate each other's system? Got to go back and forth and back and forth til it is finally more doable. You at least avoid a total failure.

You can go with Trump and believing shit that is going to make it collapse.

It is up to everyone to think about choices.

Mine is socialism all the way! If they fear everyone getting middle class and not having tiny greedy one percent being incredibly skewed? that is the recipe that makes it happen.

The opposites pulling at each other til the yielding finally makes workers get decent conditions. Results acheived. Success! ;)
#15072193
Finfinder wrote:
Blatant lie by you more so.

I would like to see a balanced budget amendment but if we voted on that today who do think would be the loudest against it?



Not really.

The Obama deficits had to do with saving the economy. Cheney threw away several trillion between wars and tax reduction on the rich. Both were really fing stupid.

Nobody is going to do a balanced budget, ever. We've run a deficit almost all the time since the beginning of the Republic.

That's your fantasy world again.
#15072195
Tainari88 wrote:I think if Joe Biden is the nominee? This race is over. Trump wins in a landslide. They will lose everything in terms of seats locally, nationally and so on.

I hope they do. The corrupt Democrats would rather lose elections than give up their privileges being bought off by globalist corporate neo-liberals and their cronies. It is horrible.

Bernie won't get a third race. For sure. But I think that might be a good thing. Once another four years of Trump with an economic meltdown he can't run from and being so incompetent with administering crisis? He won't be able to deny the issues and I think the farther left of the Democratic party that Bernie represented is going to go for a much younger candidate that will in the next eight years destroy what is left of the ass-kissing sellouts in the Republican party to the point that the newer generations will be in the driver's seat in ten years and that is the end of the conservative racist pro capitalist pathological liars.

But it will be a long haul. Another 12 years and that is it? By then it might be too late for the USA. Too much debt, market crashes, sellout freaks like Trump, and etc. They lose to the Asian powerhouses and their debts are called in to control them through external forces. Too late to right the ship.

If that is so? No one to blame but the two corrupt parties not doing anything for the voters for years and years. No health care, no education reform, too much student debt, too many people in jail, crumbling infrastructure, lots of expenditures on military equipment and the military but without providing the retired and ex veterans' enough support, etc.

It will be too late then.

But sometimes history is that way. Everyone pays for the consequences of their actions. Especially leadership.

Just stay in Mexico and shut up.
#15072208
late wrote:Not really.

The Obama deficits had to do with saving the economy. Cheney threw away several trillion between wars and tax reduction on the rich. Both were really fing stupid.

Nobody is going to do a balanced budget, ever. We've run a deficit almost all the time since the beginning of the Republic.

That's your fantasy world again.



You are such a propaganda machine. Next you are going tell me Obama is responsible for this economy. No one believes that Obama was concerned about the economy. Its like you never learn, Obama was responsible for losing local state and ferderal seats of power. Democrats didn't win any elections for years until the last midterm. You think that was because Obama's saving of the economy. :lol: :lol: Wars ? The same ones the Democrats voted for. Again no one believes this BS you try to propagandise it's hilarious. Talk about living in a fantasy world. :lol: :lol:
#15072211
Finfinder wrote:
You are such a propaganda machine.



That post was a rant, not an argument.

We lost seats in Congress over Obamacare, everyone paying attention knew that would happen.

I didn't much like the way Obama saved the economy, but he got it done. And that counts, and it's not propaganda.
#15072221
late wrote:That post was a rant, not an argument.

We lost seats in Congress over Obamacare, everyone paying attention knew that would happen.

I didn't much like the way Obama saved the economy, but he got it done. And that counts, and it's not propaganda.


My post was a reply to your post, you are like Joe Biden every day, do you know where you are right now? Do you not realize people can see the previous posts? :D

No you lost because of the bad economy and bad policy and you are going to lose again because of the economy and the do nothing policy.
#15072224
Finfinder wrote:
No you lost because of the bad economy and bad policy and you are going to lose again because of the economy and the do nothing policy.



There were several reasons Hillary lost, assuming that was what you were babbling about. Putin, Comey, that she was not a good campaigner, and that she had been subjected to decades of lies and crazy conspiracy theories.

The economy is going to sour because of the plague, and the electorate is going to turn against Trump because the economy sucks, and because he botched the response to that crisis.
#15072227
late wrote:There were several reasons Hillary lost, assuming that was what you were babbling about. Putin, Comey, that she was not a good campaigner, and that she had been subjected to decades of lies and crazy conspiracy theories.


The biggest reason she lost is because she would've been a poor President.

Trump wasn't much better, but he was better.
#15072230
ProPhoto wrote:
The biggest reason she lost is because she would've been a poor President.

Trump wasn't much better, but he was better.



She would have been a bad president, no argument there.

But that would still have been hundreds of times better than Trump.

Worst. President. Ever.
  • 1
  • 14
  • 15
  • 16
  • 17
  • 18
  • 19

Are you saying you are unable to see any obvious […]

Right wingers and capitalists and free marketeers[…]

@FiveofSwords The Chinese discovered gunpowder[…]

Indeed, and you know what? Even that isn't a reas[…]