- 04 Jul 2014 20:26
#14432439
When you describe Japan as an 'impure country', and compare it to the states in the Americas which actually are not ethno-states (and thus need to be re-formed), that is basically an attempt to de-legitimise the existence of the Japanese state, by implying that a 'Japanese people' does not exist.
Obviously if Akuma thinks that the Japanese state is legitimate, he would be offended by you telling him that 'Japan is impure', because that has certain implications when taken to its logical conclusion.
Also, that assertion contradicted everything else that has been said in this thread, since I thought that everyone has agreed that the underlying basis for the Japanese state is the existence of the Jomon ancestry, and that its ethnogenesis occurred at the time that Yayoi admixture was added and then it was left alone surrounded by water to coalesce into the 'pure' thing the exists today. Japan has not been subjected to ongoing and persistent gene flow from outside the islands into Japan.
To be honest, I am tired of constantly having these conversations, because it's been covered so many times already. People don't share my view of history, and it's not really important for me to convince the opposition to see it my way anyway, because at the end of the day it is 2014 now and no one has to listen to Europeans lecturing other population groups on whether they exist or not, or from what date they existed from.
Obviously if Akuma thinks that the Japanese state is legitimate, he would be offended by you telling him that 'Japan is impure', because that has certain implications when taken to its logical conclusion.
Also, that assertion contradicted everything else that has been said in this thread, since I thought that everyone has agreed that the underlying basis for the Japanese state is the existence of the Jomon ancestry, and that its ethnogenesis occurred at the time that Yayoi admixture was added and then it was left alone surrounded by water to coalesce into the 'pure' thing the exists today. Japan has not been subjected to ongoing and persistent gene flow from outside the islands into Japan.
To be honest, I am tired of constantly having these conversations, because it's been covered so many times already. People don't share my view of history, and it's not really important for me to convince the opposition to see it my way anyway, because at the end of the day it is 2014 now and no one has to listen to Europeans lecturing other population groups on whether they exist or not, or from what date they existed from.