KurtFF8 wrote:First two sentences: "The ICJ didn't say that! It matters what the ICJ says!"
Third sentence "It doesn't matter what the ICJ says!"
More stupid arguments, I see.
It won't matter because the reasons that impede aid delivery (active combat and misappropriation) will remain unaddressed.
So Israel will comply, but the situation on the ground won't radically change.
KurtFF8 wrote:Much weaker accusations than I thought then. A single worker was possibly involved hardly means that the organization was in any way systematically a part of the Oct 7th attack.
I've seen some people claim UNRWA, as an institution, participated in the attack which is quite extreme to make. But it is true that some of its employees did, meaning something went wrong with its hiring practices.
And yes, something is and has been wrong with it for some time.
The tunnels found under it, which were used by Hamas to boot, did not appear by spontaneous generation. Neither did
the rockets found under its schools going back as early as 2014.
And there's also its institutional refusal to teach about the Holocaust as early as 2009, funded by the UN:
Reuters wrote:Hamas slams UN over "Holocaust classes" in Gaza
By Reuters
August 30, 200911:46 AM CDT Updated 15 years ago
By Nidal al-Mughrabi
GAZA (Reuters) - Hamas condemned the United Nations Sunday, saying it planned to teach Palestinian children in the Gaza Strip about the Holocaust -- but the U.N. agency which runs schools in the enclave would not confirm any change.
Branding the Nazi genocide of the Jews "a lie invented by the Zionists," the Islamist movement which runs the Gaza Strip wrote in an open letter to a senior U.N. official that he should withdraw plans for a new history book in U.N. schools.
A spokesman for the United Nations Relief and Works Agency (UNRWA), which educates some 200,000 refugee children in Gaza, said the Holocaust was not on its current curriculum. He would not comment on Hamas's statement that it was about to change.
KurtFF8 wrote:It's quite clear that no one here is taking this line of mud slinging by you seriously. You ought to just drop it.
No, I will call mass rape advocates for what they are.
Don't like it? It hurts your feelings? Stop defending mass rapists. Simple.
Pants-of-Dog wrote:This is ridiculous.
Articles showing attacks on safe regions and corridors have been presented in this thread, with quotes. These air strikes and bombings have been independently verified. To ignore this evidence and claim the attacks did not happen is illogical and a denial of facts.
No, what has been claimed is that airstrikes were done against civilians fleeing. No evidence or independent verification was provided.
I am still waiting for it.