- 10 Jul 2019 21:22
#15017348
Not Political.
You have not provided any characteristics of your ideal economy.
Not Political.
Being partisan does not have to do with being political or not in this discussion.
Allowing private owners to do whatever they want to their workers is slavery.
What are your "rights" and "privileges?" That statement is not political.
What do you advocate?
But yours is not.
Most ignorant people think that they are "right," and that everyone else is "wrong." Anarchists, liberals, conservatives, fascists, and Islamic extremists I have encountered usually have this ignorant mindset.
You said that socialism is "ignorant."
If I "ignored" it, I would not of replied to it.
Not Political.
You cannot see fact Nor logic.
Because the both of us are not anarchists.
Not Political.
You cannot be scientific because you assume conditions contrary to scientific facts.
By defending slavery and the family institution?
You are avoiding politics on a political forum.
I am engaging in your ridiculous analysis. You are not providing enough details by refusing to answer some of my above questions, and your politics are out of context since you are not a socialist.
Where did I claim that?
Not Political.
Your statements are not facts. And some of your facts are out of context since they are not in a socialist economy.
I know it is not "false" so right there you are lying. Thus making you a liar.
Truth To Power wrote:No, I am stating the facts.
Not Political.
False. I have identified the most salient characteristics.
You have not provided any characteristics of your ideal economy.
No.
Not Political.
I'm not partisan, if that's what you mean.
Being partisan does not have to do with being political or not in this discussion.
By not violating their rights without just compensation.
Allowing private owners to do whatever they want to their workers is slavery.
Secure rights and no privileges.
What are your "rights" and "privileges?" That statement is not political.
That's a description of the current economy. That's not what I advocate.
What do you advocate?
It can be.
But yours is not.
You have a strange idea of why people hold their political beliefs.
Most ignorant people think that they are "right," and that everyone else is "wrong." Anarchists, liberals, conservatives, fascists, and Islamic extremists I have encountered usually have this ignorant mindset.
I didn't say any type of economy is ignorant.
You said that socialism is "ignorant."
You have ignored my example and simply made $#!+ up. That is normal, routine, and expected. And it should tell you something.
If I "ignored" it, I would not of replied to it.
Silliness.
Not Political.
Because socialists cannot see fact or logic.
You cannot see fact Nor logic.
I don't see any evidence that anarchists see it.
Because the both of us are not anarchists.
Your gibberish screams it.
Not Political.
Socialism cannot be scientific because it assumes conditions contrary to fact.
You cannot be scientific because you assume conditions contrary to scientific facts.
I'm the one trying to liberate people from economic oppression.
By defending slavery and the family institution?
Self-refuting gibberish.
You are avoiding politics on a political forum.
You have shown repeatedly that to the extent you understand me, you refuse to engage with my analysis.
I am engaging in your ridiculous analysis. You are not providing enough details by refusing to answer some of my above questions, and your politics are out of context since you are not a socialist.
No, you have merely realized that you can't answer them without destroying your belief system.
Where did I claim that?
Self-refuting gibberish.
Not Political.
Facts are facts.
Your statements are not facts. And some of your facts are out of context since they are not in a socialist economy.
Everyone reading this knows that is false, including you.
I know it is not "false" so right there you are lying. Thus making you a liar.