- 26 Oct 2017 02:38
#14856198
[/quote]@anna You're moving the goalposts. You said "pro Hillary and anti-Trump people wouldn't want to watch the videos, it would validate their rival’s observations of hypocrisy" because apparently you didn't realize those weren't pro-Trump sites.
Now that you realize they aren't pro-Trump sites, you've moved on to saying, in effect, "well, we need niche sites yada yada yada..."
The fact remains that the same people who are complaining about Clinton being 'in their face' all the time are likely the same ones seeing their "niche" sites post article after article after article about her. This has been going on since the inception of Drudge and the blue dress and Watergate. Nothing new here at all.[/quote]
First off I was replying to your prior post to the one I quoted. I'm not moving goal post I'm just trying to get you to stop moon walking the real issue. Which is the clear denial of the Hillary supporters as evidence of your reply.
I asked you before if you think the uranium story is a real news story and that does beg the question why the media giant CNN spent only 4 minutes reporting on it as you posted. Especially since it is so important for our country to get to the bottom of Russia meddling in the USA's business. We all know the answer to the question, it’s just that the liberal media and the Hillary supporters just can't bare the truth because they are too invested in a fake news narrative. The best part is you’d have to admit Trumps was correct this whole time. I can see how devastating that would be.
Now that you realize they aren't pro-Trump sites, you've moved on to saying, in effect, "well, we need niche sites yada yada yada..."
The fact remains that the same people who are complaining about Clinton being 'in their face' all the time are likely the same ones seeing their "niche" sites post article after article after article about her. This has been going on since the inception of Drudge and the blue dress and Watergate. Nothing new here at all.[/quote]
anna wrote:
On Breitbart's front page right now:IT’S ON: FBI INFORMANT AUTHORIZED TO SPEAK WITH CONGRESS ON CLINTON AND URANIUM
Clinton Campaign Still Paying Top Aides $300,000+
NYT Reporter: Team Hillary ‘Lied… with Sanctimony, for a Year’ About Hiring Firm Behind ‘Pee Pee’ Dossier
Former Clinton Spokesman Brian Fallon Calls Trump Dossier ‘Money Well Spent’
Report: Hillary Clinton, DNC — and One Republican — Paid for ‘Pee Pee’ Dossier
CNN Gives Four Minutes of Airtime to Clinton Uranium Deal Since Scandal Broke
First off I was replying to your prior post to the one I quoted. I'm not moving goal post I'm just trying to get you to stop moon walking the real issue. Which is the clear denial of the Hillary supporters as evidence of your reply.
I asked you before if you think the uranium story is a real news story and that does beg the question why the media giant CNN spent only 4 minutes reporting on it as you posted. Especially since it is so important for our country to get to the bottom of Russia meddling in the USA's business. We all know the answer to the question, it’s just that the liberal media and the Hillary supporters just can't bare the truth because they are too invested in a fake news narrative. The best part is you’d have to admit Trumps was correct this whole time. I can see how devastating that would be.
Last edited by Finfinder on 26 Oct 2017 02:42, edited 2 times in total.