[Godstud]

@MistyTiger Processed foods. Soy products. All these are there to feminize men, and made the family unit weaker, so the elites and rich can sow division.

[skinster]

Damn Saeko, you're cold as ice in here.

[Rancid]

They love the part they can understand. I have to admit I never really understood my parents until I had children of my own.

Same for me, I think this is true for most.

[Potemkin]

@MistyTiger Processed foods. Soy products. All these are there to feminize men, and made the family unit weaker, so the elites and rich can sow division.

[Tainari88]

Damn Saeko, you're cold as ice in here.

@skinster la Mujer en el Reino Unido:
@Saeko does not believe in bearing children for the good of America. No. She believes in her right to be living child free.

She is not going for Margaret Atwood's A Handmaid's Tale. You know Margaret Atwood based all of her storyline or plot on real historical facts. That shit that shows up in her novels are not really made up. It has been used in some form of oppression against women in some point in history. People think it is all fiction. It is not. She backs it up with facts and research. It is very interesting.

Women have been relegated in the past as only capable of incubating babies. Not capable of rational thought, definitely incapable of being political or sound in judgment, or even slightly trustworthy of doing administrative positions. I think the bourgeoisie women in the noble classes were allowed to supervise menus for fancy dinners and servant schedules.

Their role was for bringing forth the children that their boring marriages required for inheritance laws. They did not even raise their own kids. The wet nurses fed them, the governesses educated them, the servants did their laundry and their care. The bourgeoisie did not give a fuck about being involved with their own children. They were sent to boarding schools and far from their parents. I think Queen Elizabeth II sent Prince Charles to some all boys elitist school where bullying and being a man repressing emotion was a sign of good breeding.

I think that shit was horrible. But that is the ruling classes for you. For me they are the most cold, callous emotionally group of eccentric locos on the planet. Lol.

As a group women have been always seen as not capable of rational thought, and on the edge of hysterics and hysterical behavior and needing a straight jacket and being committed to the madhouse or poorhouse or workhouse of the Victorian English era.

The conservative elements are always nostalgic for a time where women knew their place, and shut their mouths, and did not aspire to have equal rights with anyone. Especially with their social and economic superiors like wealthy, white men with property and big mouths and big egos....and thinking they ruled with the intelligence of their penises.

How wrong they still are Skinster.

[senor boogie woogie]

There is no such thing as “Climate Change”! Can we stop with this lie already?

[Steve_American]

There is no such thing as “Climate Change”! Can we stop with this lie already?

We have tried to convince people like you with the proofs that climate change (CC) is real and caused by humans. People like you call the scientists liars and the research lies.

So, I'm going to try a different tack.

1] If CC is a conspiracy by many thousands of scientists and all the science journals, then who is funding it? It can't be the fossil fuel corps, because they gain by funding the CC deniers, like you.

2] In the late 80s the UN created the UN IPCC. This was supported by Pres. Reagan. Why is the IPCC still pushing CC and in fact saying we must act now or the window to avoid the worst will close in a few years? What would the UN gain by supporting this narrative?

[Godstud]

There is no such thing as “Climate Change”! Can we stop with this lie already?

You are in the wrong thread. This thread is not about that.