- 27 Dec 2016 18:46
#14755339
I too think quoting the Bible is the very weak argument. The words from the Bible prove only the words from the Bible. Of course, with having enough perverted mind it's possible to read there something about creation of the world. It's also possible to read there something about creation of Olympic games and about organization of public transport. And if to shuffle letters good, you can read there about all the history of Europe from Charlemagne to death of Napoleon. As with any other book. Because a man who reads that this way doesn't look the answers. He already knows the answers, they are all in his mind, so he doesn't get any info, he produces his own info onto a book. It's a mirror so broken it can only reflect itself.
What in reality the Bible is? It is a book containing two parts. The first part contains some writings of ancient nomadic tribes' myths, historical chronicles of these tribes organized to proto-states, political pamphlets against some honorable cattle breeders, some ancient poetry, fairy tales, writings of ritual singings. It lacks any consistency or logic or structure of material, and basically it is a literature trashyard of some boring middle-east ethnicity, filled with impossible levels of cruelty, amorality and sadism.
The second part is short stories about the Savior from four different authors who confuse most important details of this story even between themselves, the example of medieval fantasy mixed with the story of creation of a totalitarian sect, the favorite places from correspondence of this sect and finally another fantasy tale, this time without tries to somehow connect it to real history. Though the degree of violence is lowered in comparison with the first part, it's still amoral and disgusting.
The book is so senseless, illogical and opposite to conscience and common sense, that it was forbidden to read for centuries by anyone not instructed properly before how to read this book correctly. Even though it became more opened in the last time, nobody still reads it except men who have professional interest in this and blind fanatics on the level they can read phonebooks and watch carpets like TV. It's just an impossible task to read it from the beginning to the end, and that's why absolute majority of Christians never did it. It is so bad book as a book, the only way for it to be considered a good book is a ready state machine with developed mechanisms of punishments, that can force everyone to consider it a good book and feed the structures of intellectuals thinking over methods of reading this book for simple folks, who yet cannot into doublethinking.
What in reality the Bible is? It is a book containing two parts. The first part contains some writings of ancient nomadic tribes' myths, historical chronicles of these tribes organized to proto-states, political pamphlets against some honorable cattle breeders, some ancient poetry, fairy tales, writings of ritual singings. It lacks any consistency or logic or structure of material, and basically it is a literature trashyard of some boring middle-east ethnicity, filled with impossible levels of cruelty, amorality and sadism.
The second part is short stories about the Savior from four different authors who confuse most important details of this story even between themselves, the example of medieval fantasy mixed with the story of creation of a totalitarian sect, the favorite places from correspondence of this sect and finally another fantasy tale, this time without tries to somehow connect it to real history. Though the degree of violence is lowered in comparison with the first part, it's still amoral and disgusting.
The book is so senseless, illogical and opposite to conscience and common sense, that it was forbidden to read for centuries by anyone not instructed properly before how to read this book correctly. Even though it became more opened in the last time, nobody still reads it except men who have professional interest in this and blind fanatics on the level they can read phonebooks and watch carpets like TV. It's just an impossible task to read it from the beginning to the end, and that's why absolute majority of Christians never did it. It is so bad book as a book, the only way for it to be considered a good book is a ready state machine with developed mechanisms of punishments, that can force everyone to consider it a good book and feed the structures of intellectuals thinking over methods of reading this book for simple folks, who yet cannot into doublethinking.
- By wat0n
- By FiveofSwords
- By litwin