AFAIK wrote:I've looked through the lists and I'm feeling overwhelmed.
Where can I learn about Corporatism in 20th century Japan?
What about present day China?
S Korea during industrialization?
I think the key term is
Asian Values.
Note 'Asian Values' as espoused by various far east leaders emphasis regionalism, social consensus and collectivism rather than individualism, strong rule by a single party, assertion of the rightness of the the state. Sounds very similar to the western idea of fascism, no?
What the wiki article linked to above missing out on is the origin of the idea of 'Asian Values' that Lee Kuan Yew, Dr Mahathir and others were carrying on about. The concept is descended from the philosophy of Imperial Japan, created as a Japanese centered counter to Western ideas of imperialism in the early 20th century. I believe Japanese political thought in the Imperial period was influenced by Western Fascism.
The Japanese Imperial political doctrines were adopted in Asia by the various local militias formed by the Japanese during WWII. In Indonesia, for example, the local militia became the pro independence movement, led by future rulers such as Sukarno. So there was continuity between Japanese Imperial occupation and the independence movements and the succeeding nation states.
So I think you will have to start with early 20th cent Japan and study the rise of the generals and the political ideas they used to legitimate that movement. Then look at Japanese anti-western/colonial propaganda and the effect on shaping the post war independence movements. Finally we get to the modern era and the needs of Asian states to define themselves in their own terms to avoid being intellectually colonized by western entities.
Curiously there is a perception in the west that Asian Values are defunct as a result of being discredited after the Asian melt down in 1997. This seems odd as the state that did best, Malaysia, rejected western economic principles while those who followed western advice and practice did worse (eg: Thailand). One would think the 1997 crisis would have reinforced the need for developing ones own system of belief to avoid the body of ideas around which society is organized being biased to serve the ambitions of a possible rival.
A good paper on the subject
here.