http://www.politicsforum.org/Doomhammer, you simply don't understand American Football. It's a thinking man's game, unlike soccer which you take for face value.
I'm being bigotted. I admit that.
The draw to American football is the heavy amounts of strategy and real-time decision making that has to happen,
You need strategy in every human endeavor. Please do not try to trivialize soccer because it lacks "strategy" - strategy is the employment of means to fulfill ends. Every sport too must therefore have a logic of strategy. I will concede that infiltrating the opponent's territory requires the execution of sophisticated pre-planned operations to deceive the opponent, while the arranging of different offense-defense teams shows how crucial it is to pick the right combination of players.
I will now attempt to disabuse you of your misconceptions. That soccer appears to rely more on skill is simply because it forbids the use of the upper limbs -which people are more able to control. You need to be more skilled to do certain things consistently in soccer. True. But a manager at a minimum has to consider the following:
1. Choosing the right "strategy".
2. Choosing the right players
3. Which of the two matters more?
4. How to lay out the 10 players on the field to achieve our goals? What is the ideal distribution of players (and what players do we have to begin with?) to the three different areas of the field.
5. Should we prefer offensive play or defensive.
6. If offensive, do we favor advancing from the center of the field, or from the wings? Do we prefer direct passes, long passes behind the opponent, or do we primarily seek to create dead ball opportunities? Do we favor on side of the field to another to exploit or strengths or to exploit the opponent's weakness?
7. If we plan on playing defensively, will we seek to dominate the game through safe passes or let the opponent play and attempt to score with counterattacks?
8. How do we execute and defend against deadball situations? (Some freekick and corner routines are mindbogglingly complex).
9. How do we obtain the ball? What is the maximum extent to which we make physical contact with the opponent?
The manager can intervene in the game at any time to change all but players (which is limited to 3 players only).
Then comes the usual externalities that you find in every sport: 1) weather, 2) referees, 3) the form and drilling of the team 4) human error i.e. plain luck.
but also the fact that it has to be coupled with athleticism.
The average soccer player in a top European league runs about 10-11 km a match. Football players have to put up with more physical hardship in terms of being subjected to physical contact. But the game stops every 10 seconds while a whole different set of players temporarily replace you depending on whether or not you're attacking. Doesn't seem to be especially taxing as far as stamina is concerned - compared to, say, basketball or soccer.
It's a game of chess, and if you don't pay attention to the details, you will not understand it.
I play chess. I don't get football. Enlighten me.
For the record, I like watching both sports.
Know what's fun to watch? Snooker. Better than either for watching.
By the way, basketall will continue to thrive as long as other countries countinue to be enthralled with the NBA.
"It is a dangerous thing to be a Machiavelli. It is a disastrous thing to be a Machiavelli without virtū."
- Hans J. Morgenthau