The Trigger wrote:Godstud things democrat dont want to take guns odd he is wrong again . recently a congressman from california said if gun owners resist us taking thier guns we can nuke them.
I don't "things" this, I know it. Can you please quote the politician and give his name, please? I doubt this very much.
As for the Democrats' stance:
We recognize that the individual right to bear arms is an important part of the American tradition, and we will preserve Americans' Second Amendment right to own and use firearms. We believe that the right to own firearms is subject to reasonable regulation. We understand the terrible consequences of gun violence; it serves as a reminder that life is fragile, and our time here is limited and precious. We believe in an honest, open national conversation about firearms. We can focus on effective enforcement of existing laws, especially strengthening our background check system, and we can work together to enact commonsense improvements--like reinstating the assault weapons ban and closing the gun show loophole--so that guns do not fall into the hands of those irresponsible, law-breaking few.http://www.ontheissues.org/celeb/Democr ... ontrol.htmTrigger wrote:Also the criminal element look at the empty homes as a jackpot.
I recall the images in New Orleans of a young black man with a ak 47 shooting a helicopter on a rescue mission.thats not paranoia or fear its a display of reality
It's also far more rare than you think, as I provided evidence of.
Trigger wrote:A gun is like a condom. Better to have one and not need it then to need it and not have it
You cannot commit suicide or accidentally kill someone, with a condom. A condom isn't a threat to children, in the house. You're comparing completely different things, and it's rather silly.
“Let me never fall into the vulgar mistake of dreaming that I am persecuted whenever I am contradicted.” ― Ralph Waldo Emerson