Popular Front of the Third Position - Page 5 - Politics Forum.org | PoFo

Wandering the information superhighway, he came upon the last refuge of civilization, PoFo, the only forum on the internet ...

Private discussion areas.
#14348989
You can do that? Also where the fuck is my AnCap club huh? I jump in it. Edit: Actually scratch that. There are no libertarian forum supporters. You cheap bastards.
#14349136
Whilst I'm not as active as I'd like to be, I'd just like to reiterate my interest. I'm a left-wing nationalist or a right-wing socialist depending on who you ask; either way, I think I'm suitable for this group.
#14350349
Yes, you are still counted, when it forms, you'll be in, Cromwell.

Also, Travesty, jokes aside, if you really are Third Position then of course you can be in, but you have to say that you are in order to be considered.

Note, acceptance does not actually rely on my personal approval of your policy preferences. So I can promise that there will never be a "you must exactly resemble me" test for acceptance.
#14365747
If you need people Rei, I'm happy to volunteer interest. I'm mostly a lurker, but I've tamed my an-cap/libertarian tendencies, something that took a fair while. After some time, just looking at the role corporate and private interests play in the destruction of organic culture, and the removal of the Randian blindfold over my eyes was slowly achieved.

Out of curiosity, are any of the TP posters here familiar with Mencius Moldbug and other modern "neo-reactionaries"? It's a distinctly American TP movement (but this is good IMV, since its essentially growing at the heart of the beast)

http://www.thedarkenlightenment.com/the ... nick-land/

http://unqualified-reservations.blogspot.com.au/

Interested in your opinions. It's not as well known as Nouvelle Droite or GRECE, but it has been popping up on my radar a fair bit

I've been meaning to bring this up in a formal topic, since the Paternalism/Corporatism section is well and truly dead these days.

By the by, what happened to Dave? I recall him being yellow-carded a lot, but I don't see him around here anymore.
#14366921
Bridgeburner wrote:If you need people Rei, I'm happy to volunteer interest. I'm mostly a lurker, but I've tamed my an-cap/libertarian tendencies, something that took a fair while. After some time, just looking at the role corporate and private interests play in the destruction of organic culture, and the removal of the Randian blindfold over my eyes was slowly achieved.

Okay, you're in as well.

I'll do a count later, and see if we are comfortably within the threshold for group formation.

Bridgeburner wrote:Out of curiosity, are any of the TP posters here familiar with Mencius Moldbug and other modern "neo-reactionaries"? It's a distinctly American TP movement (but this is good IMV, since its essentially growing at the heart of the beast)

Yes, I know of them. But I read the whole of that 4-part thing in the first link you posted anyway, to refresh myself on it.

I think that a lot of what they've been coming out with, has drawn from a broad index of thought in Anglosphere, much of which I've seen before. However, what they've done with it is that they've turned it toward what they've self-described as 'reactionary', and they've moulded a secessionist, and Austrian-libertarian programme to go with it.

So from what I know of it, their 'neo-reactionary' idea:

  • does nothing to oppose the power of the haute-bourgeoisie, instead it actually presupposes its eternal dominance and merely seeks to 'reveal' it in public view.
  • is against integrative solutions to problems, it instead advocates 'exiting', which is to say, secession.
  • rejects the idea of geographical breeding groups and their dominance of discrete civic spaces, as being a key driver of history.

So that is definitely not a Third Position.

But maybe they'll evolve into the Third Position over time. It is still quite an amazing thing that they've managed to break free of the liberal universalist worldview in the first place, and for that much at least, I'd commend them.
#14374941
Oh, cool. I thought you will give me a hard time.

Well there is one thing I want to clarify, I think I get what you mean by that you do not want clerical-reactionaries. But I do support some sort proper spiritual basis for society and I will bring religion into discussion. But I'm not a fundamentalist and proponent of Sharia law or something of that kind, so, does that fall within the criteria?

As with every other criteria I'm clear.
  • 1
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
  • 6
  • 7
  • 33
Israel-Palestinian War 2023

I do not think Roman actions still have an impact[…]

The establishment forced Trump to cross the Rubico[…]

ATACMS missiles in Ukraine

@Rugoz Russia will learn how to counter modern w[…]

One can also consider the nonsensical race tests u[…]