Bridgeburner wrote:If you need people Rei, I'm happy to volunteer interest. I'm mostly a lurker, but I've tamed my an-cap/libertarian tendencies, something that took a fair while. After some time, just looking at the role corporate and private interests play in the destruction of organic culture, and the removal of the Randian blindfold over my eyes was slowly achieved.
Okay, you're in as well.
I'll do a count later, and see if we are comfortably within the threshold for group formation.
Bridgeburner wrote:Out of curiosity, are any of the TP posters here familiar with Mencius Moldbug and other modern "neo-reactionaries"? It's a distinctly American TP movement (but this is good IMV, since its essentially growing at the heart of the beast)
Yes, I know of them. But I read the whole of that 4-part thing in the first link you posted anyway, to refresh myself on it.
I think that a lot of what they've been coming out with, has drawn from a broad index of thought in Anglosphere, much of which I've seen before. However, what they've done with it is that they've turned it toward what they've
self-described as 'reactionary', and they've moulded a secessionist, and Austrian-libertarian programme to go with it.
So from what I know of it, their 'neo-reactionary' idea:
- does nothing to oppose the power of the haute-bourgeoisie, instead it actually presupposes its eternal dominance and merely seeks to 'reveal' it in public view.
- is against integrative solutions to problems, it instead advocates 'exiting', which is to say, secession.
- rejects the idea of geographical breeding groups and their dominance of discrete civic spaces, as being a key driver of history.
So that is definitely not a Third Position.
But maybe they'll evolve into the Third Position over time. It is still quite an amazing thing that they've managed to break free of the liberal universalist worldview in the first place, and for that much
at least, I'd commend them.