Why has the West been so hard on China on "Tibet and Xinjian - Politics Forum.org | PoFo

Wandering the information superhighway, he came upon the last refuge of civilization, PoFo, the only forum on the internet ...

Political issues in the People's Republic of China.

Moderator: PoFo Asia & Australasia Mods

Forum rules: No one-line posts please. This is an international political discussion forum moderated in English, so please post in English only. Thank you.
#14366039
The West has never stopped interfering in "Tibet and Xinjiang issues" ever since the founding of the People's Republic of China despite its overall positive relations with China after China's reform and opening-up. Under special condition, such interference could even suddenly be intensified, which caused the bilateral relations to stagnate and even retrograde within a certain period of time. It has not only made trouble to China but also done no less harm to the West.

Then why has the West been unwilling or unable to give up these acts harmful to both China and itself?

http://eng.tibet.cn/2012sy/xw/201402/t20140219_1973827.html
#14366598
Then why has the West been unwilling or unable to give up these acts harmful to both China and itself?

Because Western policy is driven by public opinion, and public opinion is driven by Hollywood movie stars, among whom a vulgarised form of Buddhism is currently fashionable. These people support Tibetan independence because Tibet is (or rather was) a Buddhist theocracy, and because they know nothing about the actual history of either Tibet or China.
#14366855
Potemkin wrote:Because Western policy is driven by public opinion, and public opinion is driven by Hollywood movie stars, among whom a vulgarised form of Buddhism is currently fashionable. These people support Tibetan independence because Tibet is (or rather was) a Buddhist theocracy, and because they know nothing about the actual history of either Tibet or China.

Can't agree more!
Russia-Ukraine War 2022

Yes that was pretty much the Gold Standard of pea[…]

He is the only candidate pledged to stop the war […]

You are mistaken about this. Even if you studied […]