Labor Movement in China - Politics Forum.org | PoFo

Wandering the information superhighway, he came upon the last refuge of civilization, PoFo, the only forum on the internet ...

Saved posts from the old blog area.
User avatar
By HoniSoit
#1849683
By HoniSoit

There is a perception that labor movement is almost non-existent under Communist rule. While it is certainly true that independent unionism has been strictly prohibited, and independently organised labor movements have frequently been met with state repression often with labor activists imprisoned, but is it true that there has been little rebellions by the workers?
Image
Workers protests are set to rise in the coming years

The fact is that there was no lack of large-scale proletariat rebellions even under Mao. Among the most prominent was the strike wave of 1956-57 during which time Chinese workers, mostly apprentices and temporary workers, seized the opportunity of the Hundred Flowers Campaign and staged more than 1,300 strikes in Shanghai alone, demanding higher wages, better welfare, permanent worker status and guaranteed promotion. During the Cultural Revolution, there was turmoil inside Chinese factories across the country. Though partially shaped by factional cleavages inside the factories, there were also deep-rooted occupational grievances and inequalities, with apprentices, the unskilled, irregular and younger workers making economic demands. And again in 1976, young workers joined with others in the mass demonstrations and riots following the death of Zhou Enlai.

Labor protests and strikes were intensified after Deng’s economic reforms largely due to the restructuring of the economy which eroded the privileges of many Chinese workers. The first wave of strikers emerged in 1980 when the Polish Solidarity Movement emboldened Chinese workers who were already dissatisfied. The late 1980s witnessed further discontents especially among state workers, contributed by rising unemployment, widening income gaps, corruption as well as rapidly rising inflation. There were 97 strikes in 1987 and over 100 in 1988, according to the official union ACFTU. Then in May and June 1989, workers in Beijing, Shanghai and a number of other cities took to the street, staging public protests and attempting to organise independent unions. June 1989 was not merely a student movement. The students were joined by tens of thousands of workers who also received the heaviest sentences following the Tiananmen crackdown. But labor strikes and protests did not stop; in fact, it had become a routine method of resistance in the 1990s. Internal reports complied by the Department of Public Security recorded a total of 480 strikes in 1992, 1,870 in 1995 and 1,740 in the first nine months of 1996.

In the past few years, the number of labor protests has been on the rise often with migrant workers demanding payment of their wages and adequate compensation following their lay-offs. The recent economic slowdown in China has already affected many migrant workers, an estimated 20 millions of which have lost their jobs over the Chinese New Year in 2009. While the central government and local authorities have in many instances tried to negotiate with the employers on the workers’ behalf in order to quell social unrests, it’s likely the number of strikes and protests would continue to rise in the coming years as more workers could become affected by the slowdown in exports as well as the general economic decline reflected in the large downward revision of GDP growth rate. If workers in China could seize the opportunity, and overcome isolation by forming alliance with other workers that have similar discontents across industries and regions, we may likely see some revolutionary changes.
By Shayn
#1849708
This is horribly simplistic, but:

Marx: Mobilize the worker.

Mao: Mobilize the peasant.

I think Mao's reason for this was his understanding of the difference of class structure in China from other cultures. China's history doesn't allow for continuous class struggle. He believed if the peasants took control of the country, Communism would follow because of the "one China" mentality of the people. The Chinese are Chinese first, workers and owners second. Get the largest group (peasant) to take over, and the rest will follow.

He was correct about the One China idea, wrong about the success of Communism. He should have called his ideology something different, allowed himself more flexible ideas on Marxism. Would have been a better example that way, I think.
User avatar
By Fasces
#1849709
The problem with the labor movement in China is simply that the state has devolved into something much like the rest of the world. This will only be fixed when political power is no longer divided along geographic lines, but rather industrial ones. Revolutionary change is needed, but precautions must be taken to ensure the same devolution does not occur. You have correctly stated that the problem among labor movements is the inability to cooperate across many regions to enact this change, but what is your solution?
User avatar
By HoniSoit
#1849714
Thanks very much for the comment, Shayn and Fasces.

Shayn wrote:Mao: Mobilize the peasant.


While Mao mobilised the peasantry to get the Communist Party into power, it was the urban industrial workers that benefited most under Mao.

Fasces wrote:You have correctly stated that the problem among labor movements is the inability to cooperate across many regions to enact this change, but what is your solution?


I don't have a solution. But I think given internet and text-messaging which have already been used to organise protests, it should have made cooperations, or at least communications, easier by bypassing the state. However, most of the protests happening today are still single-issue based and are often confined to one workplace. There is also some illusion about the government's role to help workers which tend to lead the protesters petitioning the government rather than trying to form broad alliance with other workers in different enterprises. It's also the fact that many of the protests have confined themselves to make only economic demands, rather than trying to develop a political, let alone class, consciousnesses, to borrow Marxist terminology. And lastly there is still heavy repression for those organisers and leaders of protests which often receive very long sentences for their roles. There is no simple solution as much as I would like to see.
User avatar
By Fasces
#1849746
But what if the inability of the left to organize is not a matter of means? Do you believe that when it comes to large coalitions, leftist groups are prone to splinter?

It seems from this quote that you are itching to […]

Everyone knows the answer to this question. The […]

More incoherent ramblings as one can expect from […]

Russia-Ukraine War 2022

Wait, what ? South Korea defeated communists ? Whe[…]