- 14 Nov 2016 23:08
#14737297
Won't say that cheating in a relationship is "right", but when people reach a certain point of behavior, they're basically asking to have the other end the relationship, even if not "cheated" on.
Unfortunately I lean toward thinking that in the majority of cases where a man is cheated on by a woman, he leaned toward deserving it, as due to biological differences men are more likely by default to have an urge to seek out multiple partners, while women are unlikely to unless there's something poor about the one they have, or better about the potential new one.
Also like it or not, the average man is less aesthetically intelligent than the average woman.
This is why many spineless men think that simply "going to work", "paying bills", "taking care of the kids" is enough to satisfy a discerning woman, in reality it isn't, because a state welfare check could do all of those things as well as he cold, perhaps better, and men like this are as exiting to women as a trip to the welfare office.
Men however who understand emotional nuance and more ethereal things that useless money can't provide, such as humor, music, personal character and pride however, more than transcend their silly 'economic' worth.
In short - any man who could be replaced by a robot isn't doing his part in making himself a catch to fine women, therefore he'd only be interesting to superficial women looking to use him the same way they would a government check.
Harsh truth is they both deserve each other.
Unfortunately I lean toward thinking that in the majority of cases where a man is cheated on by a woman, he leaned toward deserving it, as due to biological differences men are more likely by default to have an urge to seek out multiple partners, while women are unlikely to unless there's something poor about the one they have, or better about the potential new one.
Also like it or not, the average man is less aesthetically intelligent than the average woman.
This is why many spineless men think that simply "going to work", "paying bills", "taking care of the kids" is enough to satisfy a discerning woman, in reality it isn't, because a state welfare check could do all of those things as well as he cold, perhaps better, and men like this are as exiting to women as a trip to the welfare office.
Men however who understand emotional nuance and more ethereal things that useless money can't provide, such as humor, music, personal character and pride however, more than transcend their silly 'economic' worth.
In short - any man who could be replaced by a robot isn't doing his part in making himself a catch to fine women, therefore he'd only be interesting to superficial women looking to use him the same way they would a government check.
Harsh truth is they both deserve each other.
He understands that Death, when we have finished the part that was assigned to us, is the reward of Love. And he apprehends the truth that the greatest happiness ever granted to a man is the privilege of being happy in the hour of his death.